Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
SQLServerCentral.com
»
Editorials
»
Buggy Forever
Buggy Forever
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Saturday, April 21, 2012 3:37 PM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 3:19 PM
Points: 31,526,
Visits: 13,863
Comments posted to this topic are about the item
Buggy Forever
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1287677
Chris Harshman
Chris Harshman
Posted Monday, April 23, 2012 11:00 AM
SSCommitted
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 10:26 AM
Points: 1,572,
Visits: 1,731
Unlike physical goods where the customer can manufacture their own replacement parts when the product is no longer supported, software is bound with a license that doesn't allow the customer to produce their own patches. I would like to see end of lifed software available to customers as part of an escrow process that allows them to build their own patches if they are needed.
This sounds alot like the philosophy behind open source software, to allow the customer to customize or change a product to meet their needs or fix some problem. With commercial software though, there's too much value given to the intellectual property of the code. The model expects that all things have a finite lifespan, a planned obsolescence, so that the company can sell more product. Companies sometimes donate their end-of-life products to open source community or similar efforts but this still seems to the the exception more than the rule.
Post #1288353
GSquared
GSquared
Posted Monday, April 23, 2012 11:04 AM
SSCoach
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:45 PM
Points: 15,442,
Visits: 9,572
I was going to comment about open source software being user-patchable, but I was beaten to the punch on that.
There are other drawbacks to OSS, but that is one of the advantages. The product is never "end of life" till
you
no longer need it.
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Post #1288359
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Monday, April 23, 2012 11:33 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 3:19 PM
Points: 31,526,
Visits: 13,863
I don't really want to OSS this stuff, and I'm not sure OSS works everywhere. I like FOSS/OSS software, but I think commercial software has a place as well.
What I don't like is commercial vendors abandoning software because of money, and leaving customers with only a partial product. Even de-compiling it wouldn't be legal, which I do think is wrong. If someone has purchased it, they should own it.
We need to come to some legal agreement on this whole buy/rent/own/lease of digital assets at some point.
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1288385
john barnett
john barnett
Posted Tuesday, April 24, 2012 2:17 AM
SSChasing Mays
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:35 PM
Points: 620,
Visits: 426
Steve - you don't buy the software. What you buy is a license to use the software in accordance with the terms and conditions in the accompanying license agreement.
The software is not yours to own.
Post #1288716
GSquared
GSquared
Posted Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:34 AM
SSCoach
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:45 PM
Points: 15,442,
Visits: 9,572
john barnett (4/24/2012)
Steve - you don't buy the software. What you buy is a license to use the software in accordance with the terms and conditions in the accompanying license agreement.
The software is not yours to own.
Unless it's OSS. Then you do buy it, and can do whatever you want to with it (except claim it as your own, of course).
- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread
"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Post #1288851
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Steve Jones - SSC Editor
Posted Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:40 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 3:19 PM
Points: 31,526,
Visits: 13,863
john barnett (4/24/2012)
Steve - you don't buy the software. What you buy is a license to use the software in accordance with the terms and conditions in the accompanying license agreement.
The software is not yours to own.
I think that's a problem. The software industry has some up with this "license" concept, and I'm not sure our laws are adequate to deal with it. I'm not sure I agree that software can only be licensed, first sale laws don't apply, products can be abandoned, etc. I don't know quite how I'd change things, but I do think there are loopholes in the law and poorly developed implicit contracts in use by many vendors that need some clarification so that both sides understand their rights.
Follow me on Twitter:
@way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1288925
john barnett
john barnett
Posted Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:25 AM
SSChasing Mays
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:35 PM
Points: 620,
Visits: 426
The best non computing analogy I can think of is a book - you own the copy of it - whether paperback, hardback or ebook form, but you don't own the right to sell modify the content and give away copies or resell duplicates of it for personal gain.
However even then there are parts that fall down - some software licenses try tp prevent transfer (and I include DRM enabled ebooks in that since in the UK ebooks are classified as computer software) whereas there is nothing preventing donation or sale of a paperback copy. Many charity shops would have nothing to sell if there is no way of legally transferring ownership of printed books or other items such as board games/clothing/jigsaw puzzles.
Post #1289082
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.