Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase

Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL) Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Friday, September 2, 2011 12:03 PM
Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:41 PM
Points: 1,043, Visits: 290
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)

Gregory A. Larsen, MVP
Post #1169431
Posted Friday, October 7, 2011 2:43 AM
Grasshopper

GrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopperGrasshopper

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:26 PM
Points: 15, Visits: 13
Thank you kindly for this series.

On
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/75772/#
the link to
Level 3: Relational Database Design
which should be
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/75775/#

is actually to
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Stairway+Series/75774/#
which is
Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)

For some reason the dates at the bottom are two weeks to the future eg today is 2011/09/07 and the date on

Stairway to T-SQL Level 2: History of Structured Query Language (SQL)
is By Gregory Larsen, 2011/10/21

Martti K.
Post #1186969
Posted Friday, October 21, 2011 7:54 AM
SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, November 28, 2016 9:06 AM
Points: 126, Visits: 336
glad you mentioned Relational, Inc. Otherwise one would get the impression that M$ invented everything that is in the current Sql standard. Especially now that Sql Server 2008 is more like Oracle 10/11 than ever, which is actually a good thing.
Post #1194394
Posted Friday, October 21, 2011 10:00 AM
Right there with Babe

Right there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with BabeRight there with Babe

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 8:36 AM
Points: 722, Visits: 361
i may be wrong about this, but I thought Sytem/38 was an operating system for IBM minicomputers
Post #1194526
Posted Friday, October 21, 2011 1:45 PM
Old Hand

Old HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 11:27 AM
Points: 327, Visits: 1,161
Thank you, Greg. I enjoyed this.


Post #1194666
Posted Friday, October 21, 2011 5:21 PM


SSC-Forever

SSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-ForeverSSC-Forever

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 8:20 PM
Points: 42,081, Visits: 39,470
jberg-604007 (10/21/2011)
Especially now that Sql Server 2008 is more like Oracle 10/11 than ever, which is actually a good thing.


Since I have a primordial hatred for Oracle, I'll have to strongly disagree with that notion.


--Jeff Moden
"RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for "Row-By-Agonizing-Row".

First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column."

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to post performance problems
Post #1194734
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase

Permissions Expand / Collapse