<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=15220&wd=468&ht=60&pair=as" target="_blank"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=15220&wd=468&ht=60&pair=as" alt="i" width="468" height="60"/></a>
Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=15491&wd=120&ht=300&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=15491&wd=120&ht=300&pair=as" alt="i" width="120" height="300"/></a>
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
Article Discussions
»
Article Discussions by Author
»
Discuss content posted by Ian Stirk
»
A faster DBCC CHECKDB?
23 posts, Page 3 of 3
««
«
1
2
3
A faster DBCC CHECKDB?
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
johnzabroski
johnzabroski
Posted Thursday, September 01, 2011 9:20 AM
SSC Rookie
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 7:57 AM
Points: 47,
Visits: 183
Grant Fritchey (8/23/2011)
Excellent code. Nice article. Well explained.
But I have to say, articles like this really do make me nervous. It seems like a very healthy percentage of our fellow database professionals are missing a few fundamentals. Suggesting a way to avoid something as important as DBCC CHECKDB seems rife with potential for disaster. I'd just hate to hear "I was following your advice and now we've lost our production system."
This.
Also, the only way for DBCC CHECKDB to be faster is for Microsoft to fix tempdb so that DBAs can allocate filegroups to temporary storage on a per database (or perhaps even more granular) basis. A global tempdb database used for everything is simply the biggest design flaw in SQL Server today, period.
Post #1168751
yemi_aderele
yemi_aderele
Posted Friday, September 09, 2011 4:55 AM
Forum Newbie
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 10, 2013 4:31 AM
Points: 1,
Visits: 117
Come on guys, this is not recommended as an alternative or replacement.
It has to be better than doing nothing inbetween the usual 7 days to a month gap DBCC runs on large DB's
Credit to you Ian!!
Post #1172389
Jon-413357
Jon-413357
Posted Monday, September 12, 2011 9:02 AM
Forum Newbie
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 2:31 AM
Points: 9,
Visits: 48
yemi_aderele (9/9/2011)
Come on guys, this is not recommended as an alternative or replacement. It has to be better than doing nothing inbetween the usual 7 days to a month gap DBCC runs on large DB's
Credit to you Ian!!
I agree with Yemi, although I will also not use it because of the DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS.
Especially liked the idea of the whole check stopping early when an error is detected.
Post #1173524
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
23 posts, Page 3 of 3
««
«
1
2
3
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.
