|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 09, 2013 9:23 AM
Points: 1,288,
Visits: 2,996
|
|
Comments posted to this topic are about the item System Databases
"Technology is a weird thing. It brings you great gifts with one hand, and it stabs you in the back with the other. ... "
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 13, 2013 11:21 AM
Points: 2,163,
Visits: 2,148
|
|
Nice question thanks!
I think it would have been more challenging if it has been multiple choice...
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 3:22 AM
Points: 5,244,
Visits: 7,059
|
|
Good question. Too bad you did not include a reference in the explanation. For those who want to double check (and to see HOW those system databases can be moved), here is a reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345408.aspx
UMG Developer (9/8/2010) I think it would have been more challenging if it has been multiple choice... True. But it is, unfortunately, not possible to submit a question with only one correct answer as a multiple choice question. The software automatically decides on single choice vs multiple choice based on the number of correct answers.
Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:30 AM
Points: 3,192,
Visits: 4,151
|
|
The Resource database is a read-only database that contains all the system objects that are included with SQL Server ... So, the Resource db cannot be moved. Sorry, but this conclusion is wrong. In SQL Server 2005, the Resource database can be moved along with the master database: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345408(v=SQL.90).aspx. In SQL Server 2008, the Resource database cannot be moved (as I think) just by design.
Good question, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Old Hand
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, April 29, 2013 6:00 AM
Points: 357,
Visits: 978
|
|
| Got caught out by this question because I knew I had moved the Resource database at some point in the past. Had to have been SQL 2005 though as has been correctly pointed out it is fixed in SQL 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:03 AM
Points: 557,
Visits: 1,357
|
|
vk-kirov (9/9/2010)
The Resource database is a read-only database that contains all the system objects that are included with SQL Server ... So, the Resource db cannot be moved. Sorry, but this conclusion is wrong. In SQL Server 2005, the Resource database can be moved along with the master database: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345408(v=SQL.90).aspx. In SQL Server 2008, the Resource database cannot be moved (as I think) just by design. Good question, anyway.
Agreed. I have moved the resource database when relocating the master database in SQL Server 2005. I suspected that I'd be marked wrong on this question for selecting the "NONE" option
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Journeyman
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, March 08, 2012 5:41 AM
Points: 76,
Visits: 77
|
|
Interesting question:
SQL 2008 help says you can:
In SQL Server 2008, the default location of the Resource database is <drive>:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.<instance_name>\Binn\. The database can be moved; however, we recommend against moving it for two reasons:
Applying SQL Server service packs and hotfixes restores the database to the \Binn location.
Moving the Resource database in a failover cluster environment to a nonclustered location will cause failover cluster failure.
To move the Resource database, follow these steps.
which, I guess is superceded by the KB mentioned above.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345408.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 16, 2013 2:10 AM
Points: 1,239,
Visits: 346
|
|
| Great question, and interesting feedback as always- Thanks all
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:59 PM
Points: 1,354,
Visits: 1,299
|
|
Hugo Kornelis (9/9/2010)
Good question. Too bad you did not include a reference in the explanation. For those who want to double check (and to see HOW those system databases can be moved), here is a reference: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345408.aspxUMG Developer (9/8/2010) I think it would have been more challenging if it has been multiple choice...True. But it is, unfortunately, not possible to submit a question with only one correct answer as a multiple choice question. The software automatically decides on single choice vs multiple choice based on the number of correct answers.
Agreed too. I believe the correct answer should have been "None of these" because they can all be moved. I got it wrong but I still believe I selected the correct answer.
According to Microsoft: For information about how to move the master data and log files, see Moving System Databases. The Resource database depends on the location of the master database. If you move the master database, you must also move the Resource database to the same location.
This is found on the following page: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187837.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Veteran
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, March 16, 2013 3:33 AM
Points: 249,
Visits: 113
|
|
http://decipherinfosys.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/moving-the-resource-database-in-sql-server-2005/
A QUICK HOW-TO GUIDE if you want move resource database in SQL 2005
|
|
|
|