Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On

Add to briefcase ««12

Query difference: HOw to Avoiding UNION ALL with correlated Query Expand / Collapse
Posted Monday, January 11, 2010 3:32 AM



Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:34 AM
Points: 2,850, Visits: 4,076
i didnt get ur question but if u e asking about which query is corect and the query which has UNION ALL

I work only to learn Sql Server...though my company pays me for getting their stuff done
Post #845268
Posted Monday, January 11, 2010 4:10 AM

SSCrazy Eights

SSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy EightsSSCrazy Eights

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:11 AM
Points: 8,587, Visits: 18,753
Try this:


reg_id = ISNULL(dr1.reg_id, dr2.reg_id), -- changed
invitee_id = ISNULL(di1.invitee_id, di2.invitee_id), -- changed

contact_type = isnull(ct.cont_type_name, ''),
item_id = I.item_id,
item_type = i.item_type,
item_category = I.item_category,
item_name = I.item_name,
item_code = I.item_code,
fee_name = f.fee_name,
start_date = I.session_start_date,
end_date = I.session_end_date,
reg_date = ae.created_date,
item_quantity = ae.prod_qty,
item_price = bd.bskt_dtl_price_tier_amt,
eligible_credit = I.credit_value,
participant_flag = case
when pe.acct_id is null then 0
else 1 end,
cv_acct_id = ae.acct_id,
cv_entity_stub = ae.entity_stub,
cv_entity_type_id = ae.entity_type_id,
cv_prod_stub = ae.prod_stub
from [dbo].[ATTENDEE_ENTITY] ae with (nolock)
join [dbo].[DMP_EVENT_ITEM] I with (nolock)
on I.cv_acct_id = ae.acct_id and I.cv_evt_stub = ae.evt_stub
AND ae.prod_stub = I.cv_prod_stub
left join [dbo].[CONTACT_TYPE] ct with (nolock)
on ct.acct_id = ae.acct_id and ct.cont_type_stub = ae.cont_type_stub
left join [dbo].[BASKET_DETAIL] bd with (nolock)
on bd.acct_id = ae.acct_id and bd.bskt_dtl_stub = ae.bskt_dtl_stub
left join [dbo].[FEE] f with (nolock)
on f.acct_id = bd.acct_id and f.fee_stub = bd.bskt_dtl_fee_stub

-- changes
LEFT join [dbo].[DMP_EVENT_INVITEE] di1 with (nolock)
on di.cv_acct_id = ae.acct_id and di.cv_cont_stub = ae.entity_stub -- > Difference
and di.cv_free_stub = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'
and di.cv_evt_stub = i.cv_evt_stub

LEFT join [dbo].[DMP_EVENT_REGISTRATION] dr1 (nolock)
on dr.invitee_id = di1.invitee_id and dr.event_id = di1.event_id

LEFT join [dbo].[DMP_EVENT_INVITEE] di2 with (nolock)
on di.cv_acct_id = ae.acct_id and di.cv_free_stub = ae.entity_stub -- > Difference

LEFT join [dbo].[DMP_EVENT_REGISTRATION] dr2 with (nolock)
on dr2.cv_invitee_stub = di2.cv_invitee_stub and dr2.event_id = di2.event_id

-- \changes

left join [dbo].[PARTICIPANT_ENTITY] pe (nolock)
on pe.acct_id = ae.acct_id
and pe.evt_stub = ae.evt_stub and pe.prod_stub = i.cv_prod_stub and pe.entity_stub = ae.entity_stub
where ae.acct_id = 2000022
AND (ae.entity_type_id = 3 OR ae.entity_type_id = 10) -- > Changes

If it doesn't give the results you are expecting, please explain how the results from this query differ from those from your original query with the UNION.

“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
Exploring Recursive CTEs by Example Dwain Camps
Post #845275
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase ««12

Permissions Expand / Collapse