Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase 123»»»

Architecture Principles Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Wednesday, December 16, 2009 9:02 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:20 PM
Points: 32,764, Visits: 14,928
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Architecture Principles






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #835548
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:28 AM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:38 AM
Points: 43, Visits: 1,317
You make some interesting points Steve. As a consultant I take those architecture principles to my clients, and often it's the only way to maintain control of a big BI project. But there's always a need for vision and creativity. Those who only go by the book tend to produce a lesser result, even if it's a really good book. I would say that a consultant or employee who is 25% visionary but abides by a strong methodology 75% of the time has an ideal approach for the type of work we do.

LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/carlosbossy
Blog - http://www.carlosbossy.com
Follow me - @carlosbossy


Post #835584
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:04 AM


Old Hand

Old HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld HandOld Hand

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, April 04, 2014 8:59 AM
Points: 388, Visits: 1,033
Ooooo - Principle-Based Architecture and Values-Based Design... have you been reading my unpublished posts again?

Great editorial Steve - again!

:{> Andy


Andy Leonard
CSO, Linchpin People
Follow me on Twitter: @AndyLeonard
Post #835638
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 7:26 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:20 PM
Points: 32,764, Visits: 14,928
Thanks, and you two are probably two of those "successful" people because of your principles.






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #835659
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:04 AM
SSC Journeyman

SSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC JourneymanSSC Journeyman

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 24, 2012 2:06 PM
Points: 97, Visits: 356
Steve,

I don't often find time to post but I noticed you used Wright's falling water as your graphic for today's post. There are two great analogies that your image invites.

1. Wright was a minimalist, or the functionality of the tool or the space was the least required to accomplish the task. SSMS would not be a "Usonian" tool. Each room or piece of furniture that he designed had and met a specific purpose and nothing more.

2. The home "Falling Water" sprung multiple leaks because it was not funded or maintained after the family moved out. As a location its beauty began to diminish the day it became a museum. The deterioration took time but it was constant.
Falling Water has recently been repaired and reworked to bring it to modern standards and here is the basis of my analogy. Every tool that exists today can be outdated tomorrow. It is by consistent and diligent maintenance of databases and the tools associated with them that we avoid costly repairs later. If we ever get to the point where we have delivered the database product and move on without ensuring constant maintenance it will deteriorate into obsolescence. If a consultant or architect doesn’t architect the long term care and feeding of the product they are, in my opinion, more of a slash and burn architect.
Falling Water is a great tribute to Frank Lloyd Wright in Western PA but it’s also a great analogy for building a super product and handing it off to a customer who is enamored with the architect but not cognizant of the requirements to maintain the product.
Sustainability isn’t just a requirement for global energy products. It should be part and parcel of everything we do.


Post #835751
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:32 AM
Valued Member

Valued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued Member

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, April 05, 2014 9:12 AM
Points: 56, Visits: 308
Love the analogies Bob.
So very true regarding your second analogy. Not that I could find it in my heart to tear down a Wright building--that is another option a business is sometimes very hesitant to do. When it costs more to maintain, just let go of the past and rebuild it to meet today's needs.
Post #835768
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:46 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:20 PM
Points: 32,764, Visits: 14,928
I had the chance to tour Falling Water in 98, and heard about a number of the issues that came about over time. It is an amazing structure and this topic made me think about that piece and about how Wright designed things.






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #835773
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:53 AM
SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 10, 2014 5:44 PM
Points: 2,225, Visits: 1,258
Steve,

Here we have as team of architects who review all proposals and new system development project proposals. This review is for a series of areas from data, data integrity, application security, conformity to standards, use of enterprise components and more.

This review is done as early as possible and in a way to not kill creativity, but to insure that those creative objects are able to fit into the architecture and direction of the business.

It has been going on for years and is working well.

Good article, and as usual we all out here appreciate your work!

M.


Not all gray hairs are Dinosaurs!
Post #835776
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:48 PM
Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 2:49 PM
Points: 1,279, Visits: 2,203
Steve, you always brings us great editorials. An excellent resource for knowledge, ideas and trends.

I am your loyal reader and your editorials make me stay with SSC. Keep posting.
Post #835926
Posted Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:00 PM


SSCoach

SSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoachSSCoach

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 1:34 PM
Points: 15,442, Visits: 9,588
I can't say that I have well-articulated architectural principles, but I do have policies that I follow. I just haven't taken the time to write very many of them down. Should probably do so.

My key principle is simply, "don't build something I'll be stuck with for the rest of eternity". Lots of implications and corollaries to that one. First corollary is, "don't build something I won't understand a year from now".

Plenty of other rules. Just not articulated.


- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread

"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Post #835990
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 123»»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse