Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase

Creating User-Defined Data Types - SQL School Video Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:15 PM
SSCertifiable

SSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiableSSCertifiable

Group: Moderators
Last Login: Today @ 9:01 AM
Points: 6,705, Visits: 1,680
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Creating User-Defined Data Types - SQL School Video

Andy
SQLAndy - My Blog!
Connect with me on LinkedIn
Follow me on Twitter
Post #735918
Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:55 PM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, February 03, 2014 8:03 AM
Points: 36, Visits: 132
I've been using UDTs for years for those very reasons of consistency & self-documentation you propounded in your video. Updating the UDT has always been its Achilles heel.

Currently
You suggest in the video that UDTs should be assigned retrospectively once the database design has settled down - which almost contradicts their reason to exist! Nevertheless, structures DO change and we must synchronise our types to the new design. Here's a handy 2005 script showing all dependencies for your UDTs. At least you can see which objects you need to change or drop before updating your type. This script could be wrapped into a parameterised SP for refined filtering etc.
use [YourDB]
Select t.name UDT,
o.name Object,
o.type_desc ObjectType,
c.name AttributeName,
c.type_desc AttributeType
From (
SELECT object_id, name, user_type_id, 'SQL_COLUMN' AS type_desc
FROM sys.columns

UNION ALL

SELECT object_id, name, user_type_id, 'SQL_PROCEDURE_PARAMETER'
FROM sys.parameters
) c
JOIN sys.objects o ON o.object_id = c.object_id
JOIN sys.types t ON t.user_type_id = c.user_type_id
Where t.schema_id = 1 -- dbo (see sys.schemas for all other object owners & change as reqd)
order by
UDT,
Object

and here's one for SQL Server 2000.
use [YourDB]
Select t.name UDT,
o.name Object,
t.xusertype ObjectType,
c.name AttributeName,

case o.xtype
when 'P'
then 'SQL_PROCEDURE_PARAMETER'
else 'SQL_COLUMN'
end AttributeType

From syscolumns c
JOIN sysobjects o ON o.id = c.id
JOIN systypes t ON t.usertype = c.xusertype
Where t.uid = 1 -- dbo (see sysusers for other users' IDs)
and o.xtype in ('P','U')
order by
UDT,
Object

Another thing about UDTs: you can't use them in the Convert() or cast() functions! You get "Type xxx is not a defined system type". When are MS going to get that right? (Apologies if this exists in 2008.)

Proposal
But life shouldn't be that hard, and I would propose the following solution for a near-future SQL Server upgrade.

Eliminate UDTs!

In almost all database scripting scenarios, every variable is derived from, or has a relationship with, a table-based field. Why not use that field's type when declaring any variable or SP parameter etc? So, for example, when creating a variable relating to tblClient.EMailAddress, it would be defined as:
declare @EMailAddress tblClient.EMailAddress%Type
The upshot of this extension to the syntax is that all variables' types would be dynamic and would depend on the CURRENT type of the underlying source field at execution time. No need to update anything except the table structure! In the purest form, no type except for those defining table fields would use a system type. Oracle have been doing it for years and it works a treat. From a user/programmer perspective, the change would be painless, rock solid and even more self-documenting than UDTs now. Changing the underlying SQL Server engine to use this proposed syntax may not be be so trivial...
Post #737932
Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:01 PM
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:57 PM
Points: 3, Visits: 14
I think you are dead on regarding the cumbersome nature of the udt's and about Oracle's typcasting of variables. Wouldn't it be nice to have a stored procedure where you feed in the user defined datatype to be modified as one argument, and the revised definition as the second argument, where upon the sp produces a script that finds all instances and generates the necessary conversion code? (or an SSIS package to do this)

After being diligent over the years to define domain types in erwin and its ilk, this seems like it could be really handy if it weren't so cumbersome.

SCott
Post #738049
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase

Permissions Expand / Collapse