|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, December 02, 2011 12:11 AM
Points: 125,
Visits: 77
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, May 13, 2013 7:43 PM
Points: 16,
Visits: 546
|
|
Wow Martin, This is a great article. Totals columns, 13 week averages, % change -- all of these have been a critical part of reporting that I felt matrix tables would be well suited for if one could only add extra columns. This really pushes our reporting capabilities ahead by light years!
Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:32 AM
Points: 13,
Visits: 127
|
|
| When do you think you'll have the SSAS article in a draft form?
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, February 25, 2013 12:52 PM
Points: 513,
Visits: 426
|
|
| Really a clever way. I've been using the addition of an extra table with similar grouping as the matrix one but then I always lost the ability to export and also on sorting capability (as is that is pretty limited in a matrix report). Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 28, 2011 11:41 AM
Points: 14,
Visits: 65
|
|
Another way to do this using more of the native function of the Matrix would be to create a grouping column, where one group value is tied to the Articles sold and another group value tied to the Target information.
Group 01 is the Articles sold.
Group 02 is the target.
The data set would look like:
grp Name Month #Sold == ==== ===== ==== 01 Franz 200801 10 01 Franz 200803 7 01 Franz 200804 12 02 Franz Target -20 (Trick:note negative Target value is need to make the "math" ok when sub totalling)
Then just set up totalling on your matrix report to provide sub totals per the group value.
Special Notes: 1) In order for the final total to come out correctly the Target data needs to go in as a negative number 2) You would have to have a special format option when displaying the "target" data to not show the negative 3) You would still need to use the techniques, described in the article, for proper sequencing and column headers and such on the final report.
Advantages: - Your data set only has raw data in it, rather than mixing raw data and summary data. - Much Simpler T-SQl statements - Lets the matrix list do what it does best.
Regards All
Matteo
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, December 02, 2011 12:11 AM
Points: 125,
Visits: 77
|
|
Hello bteague,
I hope to have that article written within the next week. But I do not know how long it takes for the article to be published.
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
SSCarpal Tunnel
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 1:35 AM
Points: 4,789,
Visits: 1,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:32 AM
Points: 13,
Visits: 127
|
|
| Excellent. If it looks like you'll have something ready and the "posting/publishing" is delayed, can you e-mail something in the interim. :)
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, November 02, 2009 8:46 AM
Points: 875,
Visits: 313
|
|
This is a great article, and I must apologize -- this is the first time I went to rate an article, and I meant to give it 5 stars. Unfortunately my unfamiliarity with the process led to only crediting it with one star. If the editor could change that vote I would appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
SSChasing Mays
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:04 PM
Points: 612,
Visits: 209
|
|
Martin,
First of all Thank you for really good article with perfect example to show the functionality. I fully support your approch of stored functions/stored procedures to generate the result set with the calculation and just use basic functions of SSRS to display the data especially, as you wrote, while exporting report to excel. Again it was a very good article....Keep it on.....:)
|
|
|
|