Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase 12»»

Difference between sql server 2005 and 2008 Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Monday, February 25, 2008 5:39 AM
SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 5:43 AM
Points: 129, Visits: 252
Hi guys..

can anybody refere me any article or can tell me what's the basic difference between sql server 2005 and 2008, acutally i want to move to 2008 but, if there not much mager difference then i won't..

Thanks and looking forward.
-MALIK
Post #459626
Posted Monday, February 25, 2008 7:28 AM


Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, November 14, 2014 7:25 AM
Points: 1,157, Visits: 3,269
From the horse's mouth :D

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/2008/prodinfo/newfeatures.mspx

Don Schlichting also wrote a few good articles on some of the new features available in 2008.

http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3691821

http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3697056

http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3702381


Tommy

Post #459675
Posted Monday, February 25, 2008 7:42 AM


Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 26, 2012 5:26 AM
Points: 1,367, Visits: 1,585
The new features are summarized on https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/content/content.aspx?ContentID=5470

There are many new features, so it depends on what you need. If you store large files in SQL Server, migrated from Oracle and want to use date and time data types, need to encrypt your databases, etc you will definitely want to look at 2008. The nice thing is that it upgrading should be much easier from 2005 to 2008 than it was from 2000 to 2005.

Regards,
Andras




Andras Belokosztolszki, MCPD, PhD
GoldenGate Software
Post #459682
Posted Monday, February 25, 2008 8:20 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Yesterday @ 4:16 PM
Points: 31,284, Visits: 15,748
I'd argue that if you are considering the move, and can wait until the fall, I'd go with 2008. There are now going to be releases every 2-3 years, which means you'll get about 6 years of support on a version. So if you go to 2005, you'll be considering an upgrade in 3 years, which you may not need. If you go 2008, you can still upgrade in 3 years if you want, but can wait 6 years if you don't need to.







Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #459706
Posted Monday, February 25, 2008 10:38 PM
SSC-Addicted

SSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-Addicted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 3, 2013 9:53 PM
Points: 433, Visits: 619
The Denver SQL Server Users group has had some really good presentations over the last couple of months on the new features in SQL 2008 including one from Paul Nielsen just last week shortly after he got back from "Jump Start" up in Redmond (if I remember the name of the event correctly).

A couple of caveats on all of the "new features" for SQL 2008, the triage to determine which features will be in the various editions is still in progress. Many/most of the new/very cool features like data compression, partitioned indexes, policies, etc. are only going to be in the enterprise edition. Unless you're planning on running enterprise edition a lot of the features that are in the CTP's will probably not be in SQL 2008 standard, etc.

On other minor but often overlooked issue - SQL 2008 will only be 64-bit, if you're buying new hardware shouldn't be an issue but if you're planning on using existing hardware... also, if you've got dependencies on third party drivers (e.g. oracle) best be sure that a 64-bit version is available/works.



Post #460059
Posted Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:47 PM
Ten Centuries

Ten CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen CenturiesTen Centuries

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, October 10, 2014 8:13 AM
Points: 1,278, Visits: 2,204
Good input. I was looking for these kinds of information.

Webcast is also a good place to go. http://www.microsoft.com/events/series/technetsqlserver2008.aspx?tab=webcasts
Post #460491
Posted Tuesday, February 26, 2008 6:08 PM
Valued Member

Valued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued MemberValued Member

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Sunday, November 23, 2014 7:04 PM
Points: 51, Visits: 894
Joe Clifford (2/25/2008)

...
On other minor but often overlooked issue - SQL 2008 will only be 64-bit, if you're buying new hardware shouldn't be an issue but if you're planning on using existing hardware... also, if you've got dependencies on third party drivers (e.g. oracle) best be sure that a 64-bit version is available/works.


This SQL Server 2008 version feature comparison implies that there will be a 32 bit version:

http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/d/f/2df66c0c-fff2-4f2e-b739-bf4581cee533/SQLServer%202008CompareEnterpriseStandard.pdf
Post #460638
Posted Tuesday, February 26, 2008 10:19 PM
SSC-Addicted

SSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-AddictedSSC-Addicted

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, June 3, 2013 9:53 PM
Points: 433, Visits: 619
CC -

I stand corrected; apparently there will be 32 bit versions of SQL 2008 which is a change from what I had read at CTP5, I thought it was pretty aggressive of MS to force folks to 64-bit, if I remember correctly they said that only developer would run 32-bit at that point in time.

That document is dated 2/22/2008 and well worth a read, thanks for pointing it out. This is the first "official" thing I've seen that clarifies what will be in each version - just be sure to note the disclaimer on the bottom of each page.

Joe



Post #460683
Posted Monday, May 5, 2008 11:27 AM


Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:58 AM
Points: 8, Visits: 187
During recent Hero's (SQL 2008 + Server 2008 + VS 2008) events, MS SQL guys noted that NEXT release of SQL (2010+) will be 64-bit only. That bit of info has not been confirmed.
Post #495138
Posted Monday, May 5, 2008 1:14 PM
SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 7:36 AM
Points: 127, Visits: 517
I've seen many times where MS said they plan on post Windows Server 2008 and SQL 2008 to be 64bit only. If you don't have a 64bit server by 2011, you have to be trying to not upgrade. With old memory holding stagnant for price drops and new kingston/crucial DDR2-667 ecc memory going for 2x2GB going for $120, how would someone not want a newer computer with those prices?
Post #495208
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 12»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse