|
|
|
SSC Veteran
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:33 AM
Points: 285,
Visits: 1,376
|
|
SanjayAttray (3/27/2009) Good article, Solomon. Will try to implement it on our siebel server.
Hello Sanjay and thanks. However, the author of this article is Ryan Cooper so he should be getting your compliment .
SQL# - http://www.SQLsharp.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 2:50 PM
Points: 57,
Visits: 317
|
|
Hi all,
How do the results gleaned from this setup compare to what's available in the SQL2005 "missing index" dynamic management views?
|
|
|
|
|
Grasshopper
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 10:25 PM
Points: 24,
Visits: 316
|
|
They would not directly relate at all. This setup uses the size of the index in its calculation to determine the impact of reading it from disk. So, if there is no index, it obviously wouldn't be in this.
However, perhaps, by adding an index recommended by that DMV and reviewed for yourself, you should see a reduction in i/o cost for other indexes related to that table using this method, and hopefully a reduction overall for that table.
|
|
|
|