|
|
|
SSChampion
        
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:36 PM
Points: 10,040,
Visits: 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:51 AM
Points: 5,232,
Visits: 7,023
|
|
The link in the explanation appears to be broken. If I click it, I get this text:
The resource could not be found Sorry, we could not find the resource at http://www.sqlservercentral.com:80/questions/61240/Reporting Services and ReportViewer Controls in Visual Studio
If problems persist, please contact us to let us know.
Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, March 22, 2013 5:58 PM
Points: 561,
Visits: 440
|
|
| I may have gotten it wrong if the question were not sponsored. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 11:51 AM
Points: 5,232,
Visits: 7,023
|
|
Hugo Kornelis (10/30/2007)
The link in the explanation appears to be broken. If I click it, I get this text: The resource could not be found Sorry, we could not find the resource at http://www.sqlservercentral.com:80/questions/61240/Reporting Services and ReportViewer Controls in Visual Studio
If problems persist, please contact us to let us know.
Still not fixed.....
Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 07, 2010 6:52 PM
Points: 516,
Visits: 46
|
|
When I was told I got the question wrong, I thought there must of been a trick question. I did a little research and it appears to me that my answer of 2.0 should be correct. "Fortunately, .NET 2.0 comes with a ReportViewer control that meets your basic reporting needs. ", is a statement taken from a DotNetBips.com page titled, "Working with ReportViewer control Of ASP.NET 2.0" found at http://www.dotnetbips.com/articles/51df0f69-ee0e-4982-a7bb-d3e9b2182841.aspx. This appears to be nothing more than a play on words, and in today's BI world, there is no room for this "I got you" approach.
|
|
|
|