Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase

ssis Logging FIle vs syslog table in database Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Friday, March 22, 2013 10:08 AM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 06, 2013 1:51 PM
Points: 32, Visits: 124
Hello everyone !!

I am planning to implement SSIS logging . I have tried both the log to a file and log to the database . I am having a hard time choosing among the two.

I would like to get some advice from some of the more experienced SSIS developers if any one of them would be better in the long run?

I also intend to set up an email notification on failed tasks and send the log details via email.
Post #1434365
Posted Friday, March 22, 2013 10:24 AM
SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: 2 days ago @ 4:25 AM
Points: 117, Visits: 473
I've done both and found tables to be easier to get the info you need out such as timings of steps etc. However i have generally found that support/help teams prefer text file logging. In my previous place we used tables then moved to text files because the help guys preferred it - they never really got to grips with querying a table when things went wrong (they were a bunch of numpties tho).

So my opinion is it depends on who will support your load

Mack
Post #1434378
Posted Friday, March 22, 2013 11:25 AM
SSC-Enthusiastic

SSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-EnthusiasticSSC-Enthusiastic

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:01 PM
Points: 121, Visits: 420
It may be coincidence, but I've never worked for a company that uses text files for logging or auditing - always table driven. Personally, I'd never use text files for similar reasons that I'm not a fan of using .raw files. Everything should use tables IMO. The person above makes a good case for the possibility of text files, but most DW troubleshooting is done by the developers and I just couldn't imagine using text files vs the ease of querying a table. Kimball has a nice auditing framework that provides the basics - for free. I've seen a lot of companies use this as their base and then expand upon it.
Post #1434429
Posted Friday, March 22, 2013 11:29 AM


Hall of Fame

Hall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of FameHall of Fame

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:22 PM
Points: 3,017, Visits: 4,471
+1 ... I would go for a table too. Much more flexible.

_____________________________________
Pablo (Paul) Berzukov

Author of Understanding Database Administration available at Amazon and other bookstores.

Disclaimer: Advice is provided to the best of my knowledge but no implicit or explicit warranties are provided. Since the advisor explicitly encourages testing any and all suggestions on a test non-production environment advisor should not held liable or responsible for any actions taken based on the given advice.
Post #1434438
Posted Friday, March 22, 2013 12:35 PM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, June 06, 2013 1:51 PM
Points: 32, Visits: 124
Thank you guys !
I would start logging with a table.
Post #1434475
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase

Permissions Expand / Collapse