Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Red Gate Software Ltd.
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 
        
Home       Members    Calendar    Who's On


Add to briefcase 12»»

A Computer Goes to College Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:43 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:31 PM
Points: 32,780, Visits: 14,941
Comments posted to this topic are about the item A Computer Goes to College






Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1416809
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:24 AM


UDP Broadcaster

UDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP Broadcaster

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:40 PM
Points: 1,477, Visits: 4,281
The specs posted for the Jeopardy system include 2880 cores and 16TB of RAM. That's not the size of system many of us every get to work with. The software, called DeepQA, is the core of the system and allows it to process vast amounts of data and make connections between the data to answer questions.

If we wanted to hire Watson as a conultant to help crunch numbers, what would his hourly rate would be?



"Winter Is Coming" - April 6, 2014
Post #1417061
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:46 AM
SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 10, 2014 5:44 PM
Points: 2,225, Visits: 1,258
Back in 1975 IBM or one of it's team unofficially stated it would take a two story computer the size of the state of Texas to replicate the capabilities of the human brain. I know Watson does not rival the complete human brain in all areas of intellect and process, but I still wonder how large it really is.

M.



Not all gray hairs are Dinosaurs!
Post #1417201
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:01 AM


UDP Broadcaster

UDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP Broadcaster

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:40 PM
Points: 1,477, Visits: 4,281
Miles Neale (2/7/2013)
Back in 1975 IBM or one of it's team unofficially stated it would take a two story computer the size of the state of Texas to replicate the capabilities of the human brain. I know Watson does not rival the complete human brain in all areas of intellect and process, but I still wonder how large it really is.

M.


Watson capabilities are impressive, but they are also narrow in scope when compared to the human brain. The human brain does a lot more than applying a semantic searches against a huge database.



"Winter Is Coming" - April 6, 2014
Post #1417211
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:14 AM
SSCrazy

SSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazySSCrazy

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Monday, March 10, 2014 5:44 PM
Points: 2,225, Visits: 1,258
Eric M Russell (2/7/2013)
Miles Neale (2/7/2013)
Back in 1975 IBM or one of it's team unofficially stated it would take a two story computer the size of the state of Texas to replicate the capabilities of the human brain. I know Watson does not rival the complete human brain in all areas of intellect and process, but I still wonder how large it really is.

M.


Watson capabilities are impressive, but they are also narrow in scope when compared to the human brain. The human brain does a lot more than applying a semantic searches against a huge database.


As you can tell from the post, I am in complete agreement. Watson has a limited functional set to be sure but still for what it does it is amazing. The human brain far surpasses we can produce or program, however listening to the news I often wonder if some people are using even a half a percent of what they have between their ears.




Not all gray hairs are Dinosaurs!
Post #1417221
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:17 AM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:31 PM
Points: 32,780, Visits: 14,941
Miles Neale (2/7/2013)
Back in 1975 IBM or one of it's team unofficially stated it would take a two story computer the size of the state of Texas to replicate the capabilities of the human brain. I know Watson does not rival the complete human brain in all areas of intellect and process, but I still wonder how large it really is.

M.



The picture in the editorial, AFAIK, is correct. Looks around container-ish size.







Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1417223
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:43 AM
SSC Rookie

SSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC RookieSSC Rookie

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, April 19, 2013 8:44 AM
Points: 45, Visits: 283
I'm interested in what the first quantum computer will look like. Will it need as much memory? Fewer CPU's? Maybe the more important issue is how do we write better software to more efficiently process our data and leverage our hardware? There seems to be an ever-growing disparity in the quality of our logic and the hardware that runs it.
Post #1417243
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:49 AM


UDP Broadcaster

UDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP Broadcaster

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:40 PM
Points: 1,477, Visits: 4,281
Miles Neale (2/7/2013)
Eric M Russell (2/7/2013)
Miles Neale (2/7/2013)
Back in 1975 IBM or one of it's team unofficially stated it would take a two story computer the size of the state of Texas to replicate the capabilities of the human brain. I know Watson does not rival the complete human brain in all areas of intellect and process, but I still wonder how large it really is.

M.


Watson capabilities are impressive, but they are also narrow in scope when compared to the human brain. The human brain does a lot more than applying a semantic searches against a huge database.


As you can tell from the post, I am in complete agreement. Watson has a limited functional set to be sure but still for what it does it is amazing. The human brain far surpasses we can produce or program, however listening to the news I often wonder if some people are using even a half a percent of what they have between their ears.



I'd bet money that a human with an IQ of 120 and access to Google could probably beat Watson at Jeopardy more often than not.
I mean, why does Watson get to have a database on not the human opponents?



"Winter Is Coming" - April 6, 2014
Post #1417246
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:13 AM


UDP Broadcaster

UDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP BroadcasterUDP Broadcaster

Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:40 PM
Points: 1,477, Visits: 4,281
Here’s how Watson works: The computer has been preloaded with information taken from encyclopedias, news articles and even the Internet. Other components include software that analyzes the question or clue and figures out what category — person, place or thing, for example— the clue is referring to, as well as software that can use the result of the clue analysis to generate a large number of candidate answers.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/41581340/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/jeopardy-vs-computer-how-ibms-watson-works/


Rather than relying on preloaded databases that have been selected by human engineers with the anticipation that it will compete in a game of Jeopardy, I think it would be interesting to have a Watson clone start out "life" with a clean slate. Give it nothing but the sensory inputs and basic algorthms needed to interact with it's environment, and then let it learn experientially through classrooms, the internet, and human interactions. For example, when it gets an aswer wrong, it can learn from it's mistakes, gradually indexing and ranking it knowledge in terms of context and reliability.



"Winter Is Coming" - April 6, 2014
Post #1417261
Posted Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:02 PM


SSC-Dedicated

SSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-DedicatedSSC-Dedicated

Group: Administrators
Last Login: Today @ 4:31 PM
Points: 32,780, Visits: 14,941
I think some of the idea here is to see if we can do, or the DeepQA stuff can do, what Eric suggests. I thought I'd read the the medical version of Watson was kind of like this, learning over time as it interacted with doctors.

As far as Jeopardy goes, the computer was loaded with a database, just like humans are. They tried to mimic some fast learning. Once the show started, the computer had no connections to any databases other than what was in it's storage/mind.

I'm not sure this was a bad test.







Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest

Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Post #1417284
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

Add to briefcase 12»»

Permissions Expand / Collapse