<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=15220&wd=468&ht=60&pair=as" target="_blank"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=15220&wd=468&ht=60&pair=as" alt="i" width="468" height="60"/></a>
Log in
::
Register
::
Not logged in
Home
Tags
Articles
Editorials
Stairways
Forums
Scripts
Videos
Blogs
QotD
Books
Ask SSC
SQL Jobs
Training
Authors
About us
Contact us
Newsletters
Write for us
<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=15491&wd=120&ht=300&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=15491&wd=120&ht=300&pair=as" alt="i" width="120" height="300"/></a>
Recent Posts
Recent Posts
Popular Topics
Popular Topics
Home
Search
Members
Calendar
Who's On
Home
»
SQL Server 2008
»
SQL Server 2008 - General
»
Reorganize Indexes in sql 2008
Reorganize Indexes in sql 2008
Rate Topic
Display Mode
Topic Options
Author
Message
mssqlsrv
mssqlsrv
Posted Friday, September 14, 2012 12:56 AM
Valued Member
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:32 PM
Points: 72,
Visits: 244
Hi,
I have done reorganizing of 76 indexes.
But after that some of the indexes have no effect.
Can anyone explain why SQL is not able to do that?
Post #1359069
HowardW
HowardW
Posted Friday, September 14, 2012 2:11 AM
Ten Centuries
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 6:36 AM
Points: 1,035,
Visits: 7,671
Do what? What do you mean by "have no effect"?
Post #1359107
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
Posted Friday, September 14, 2012 2:47 AM
SSC-Dedicated
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:57 PM
Points: 37,687,
Visits: 29,945
Let me guess....
You've seen no change in fragmentation. These tables are all very small, maybe a few hundred to a few thousand rows.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008, MVP
SQL In The Wild
: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass
Post #1359119
mssqlsrv
mssqlsrv
Posted Monday, September 24, 2012 2:57 AM
Valued Member
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:32 PM
Points: 72,
Visits: 244
Yes Gail, fragmentation value was not changed.
I checked the page count for those tables and it was below 100.
Thanks ALL.
Post #1363374
anthony.green
anthony.green
Posted Monday, September 24, 2012 3:00 AM
SSCertifiable
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, April 12, 2013 3:51 AM
Points: 5,075,
Visits: 4,831
Table is to small for it to be reorganized, typically anything less than 1000 pages should be excluded from rebuilds/reorganizations.
Want an answer fast? Try here
How to post data/code for the best help - Jeff Moden
Need a string splitter, try this - Jeff Moden
How to post performance problems - Gail Shaw
CrossTabs-Part1
&
Part2 - Jeff Moden
SQL Server Backup, Integrity Check, and Index and Statistics Maintenance - Ola Hallengren
Managing Transaction Logs - Gail Shaw
Troubleshooting SQL Server: A Guide for the Accidental DBA - Jonathan Kehayias and Ted Krueger
Post #1363375
« Prev Topic
|
Next Topic »
Permissions
You
cannot
post new topics.
You
cannot
post topic replies.
You
cannot
post new polls.
You
cannot
post replies to polls.
You
cannot
edit your own topics.
You
cannot
delete your own topics.
You
cannot
edit other topics.
You
cannot
delete other topics.
You
cannot
edit your own posts.
You
cannot
edit other posts.
You
cannot
delete your own posts.
You
cannot
delete other posts.
You
cannot
post events.
You
cannot
edit your own events.
You
cannot
edit other events.
You
cannot
delete your own events.
You
cannot
delete other events.
You
cannot
send private messages.
You
cannot
send emails.
You
may
read topics.
You
cannot
rate topics.
You
cannot
vote within polls.
You
cannot
upload attachments.
You
may
download attachments.
You
cannot
post HTML code.
You
cannot
edit HTML code.
You
cannot
post IFCode.
You
cannot
post JavaScript.
You
cannot
post EmotIcons.
You
cannot
post or upload images.
Copyright © 2002-2013 Simple Talk Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Report Abuse.
