|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 2:42 PM
Points: 3,457,
Visits: 2,532
|
|
| Great question! Thanks, Wayne!
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:57 PM
Points: 2,575,
Visits: 1,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:20 AM
Points: 980,
Visits: 343
|
|
| Never used sparse columns in my SQL experience, do any developers here use them frequently?
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 02, 2013 3:45 PM
Points: 3,748,
Visits: 928
|
|
Great question, Wayne. Made me think and research a lot.
"El" Jerry.
"A watt of Ottawa" - Gerardo Galvan
|
|
|
|
|
Say Hey Kid
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Friday, April 19, 2013 10:27 AM
Points: 690,
Visits: 1,100
|
|
churlbut (8/29/2012) Never used sparse columns in my SQL experience, do any developers here use them frequently? I have never used them and am not sure I understand their true applicability.
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 3:07 PM
Points: 7,096,
Visits: 7,156
|
|
Good question.
I find it rather surprising that 19% of people to date think the column name doesn't carry over, and 17% think the data type doesn't carry over - I would expect more than 90% of people to know that both those properties are transferred to the new table.
30% of people think that nullability doesn't carry over to the new table, and that's not just surprising it's appalling.
Only 18% of people thought that sparseness carried only, so about as many people understand that sparseness is not copied as understand that the column names are or that data types are. Seems quite bizarre! And about twice as many get sparseness right than nullability, which seems even bizarrer.
Tom Que conclure à la fin de tous mes longs propos? C'est que les préjugés sont la raison des sots. (Voltaire, 1756)
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 10:05 AM
Points: 6,368,
Visits: 8,231
|
|
Thanks Tom,
I have to agree with your assessment. I would have expected the name, data type and null-ability to all be >95%.
I actually felt that this question was so easy, that I asked Steve to not show the number of correct answers... if it showed 3, I felt that everyone would just check those 3. (My thinking was that they would apply deductive reasoning, instead of thinking about the question. I wanted more thought to go into it.)
Wayne Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server 2008 If you can't explain to another person how the code that you're copying from the internet works, then DON'T USE IT on a production system! After all, you will be the one supporting it! Links: For better assistance in answering your questions, How to ask a question, Performance Problems, Common date/time routines, CROSS-TABS and PIVOT tables Part 1 & Part 2, Using APPLY Part 1 & Part 2, Splitting Delimited Strings
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 3:32 AM
Points: 843,
Visits: 211
|
|
Pure chance.
some way of compensation ?
|
|
|
|