|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 5:11 PM
Points: 7,104,
Visits: 7,168
|
|
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Prime Attributes
Tom Que conclure à la fin de tous mes longs propos? C'est que les préjugés sont la raison des sots. (Voltaire, 1756)
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Fame
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 8:31 AM
Points: 3,129,
Visits: 4,312
|
|
Interesting question, Tom Thanks, really got the grey matter working on this one.
____________________________________________ Space, the final frontier? not any more... All limits henceforth are self-imposed. “libera tute vulgaris ex”
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 7:12 AM
Points: 1,164,
Visits: 730
|
|
Great question Tom, I can say that as I surprised myself by getting the right answer
_____________________________________________________________________ "The difficult tasks we do immediately, the impossible takes a little longer"
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, May 18, 2013 11:44 PM
Points: 1,216,
Visits: 297
|
|
It is very good question. I was sure about the half part. Got to revise lots of things.
Basics matter!!
Best Regards, Sudhir
|
|
|
|
|
SSCarpal Tunnel
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 3:39 PM
Points: 4,804,
Visits: 8,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:06 AM
Points: 849,
Visits: 323
|
|
Hmmmm. I used the same source (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization) i hope (because the link provided on the result page isn't existing), and there is a definition: A prime attribute, conversely, is an attribute that does occur in any candidate key.
But is it wrong then?
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:53 AM
Points: 1,176,
Visits: 778
|
|
Thanks Tom. (open up QotD and knew immediately who wrote it! )
After your question last week I did some revision so was a little better prepared to tackle this one today. Certainly making me flex the ol' brain in areas that are not as regularly flexed!
|
|
|
|
|
Ten Centuries
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, January 31, 2013 8:53 AM
Points: 1,176,
Visits: 778
|
|
palotaiarpad (10/12/2011) Hmmmm. I used the same source (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization) i hope (because the link provided on the result page isn't existing), and there is a definition: A prime attribute, conversely, is an attribute that does occur in any candidate key.
But is it wrong then?
The context here is that Non-Prime attribute does not occur in any candidate key, so CONVERSELY, a PRIME attribute does occur in any [but not all] candidate keys
The statement is correct, however the WIKI definition could certainly be worded a little better...
|
|
|
|
|
SSCommitted
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 10:07 AM
Points: 1,636,
Visits: 10,852
|
|
Too bad half right doesn't count for anything...
Good question, Tom!
Rob Schripsema Accelitec, Inc
|
|
|
|
|
SSCertifiable
       
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 9:12 PM
Points: 5,103,
Visits: 20,208
|
|
|
|
|