|
|
|
UDP Broadcaster
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:57 PM
Points: 1,491,
Visits: 3,008
|
|
Tom.Thomson (8/7/2011)
john.arnott (8/6/2011) Perhaps put off by the apparent snarkiness ("I would hope that most...") of Tom's refutal of my post questioning the use of Float for monetary values, ....You must have missed that "I would hope that most" and "But let's say it" were echoes? I thought that such clear echoes eliminated the need for smileys. Evidently I was wrong. I'm sorry if I caused offence. Edit: B****y English grammar. Tom, It was more than clear that you echoed my structure. It was obvious that you were attempting to be humorous, but I have to point out that any humor found would only have been at my expense. Smileys may or may not have helped. Sometimes it's easy to forget that although a rebuttal stated mockingly may be an effective rhetorical tool to reinforce one's point, it can be considered a personal affront. A deliberate echo of someone's writing that turns his words upon his own statement can seem to attack the writer of that post more than its content.
I do accept your apology and thank you for opening the dialog on a point that deserves attention, even if it's not so simple a topic as a COBOL-inspired myth that needs debunking. This may not be the appropriate thread in which to continue that discussion, but your point and Paul's clarifications have certainly been valuable to me.
|
|
|
|
|
SSCrazy
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 1:57 PM
Points: 2,575,
Visits: 1,533
|
|
Love logic questions. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Mr or Mrs. 500
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:04 PM
Points: 542,
Visits: 187
|
|
| Excellent Question.... nice puzzling logic....
|
|
|
|
|
Old Hand
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, April 27, 2013 9:30 PM
Points: 392,
Visits: 384
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Veteran
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 5:08 AM
Points: 276,
Visits: 132
|
|
good twister
To get third highest salary
select MAX(salary) from Employees where salary <(select MAX(salary) from Employees where salary <(select MAX(salary) from Employees))
|
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 10:13 PM
Points: 69,
Visits: 24
|
|
Good Question. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
SSChasing Mays
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Saturday, April 06, 2013 12:20 AM
Points: 649,
Visits: 263
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC Eights!
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:30 AM
Points: 861,
Visits: 1,436
|
|
harsh.lapashiya (11/15/2011) good twister
To get third highest salary
select MAX(salary) from Employees where salary <(select MAX(salary) from Employees where salary <(select MAX(salary) from Employees))
I know this is a year old post but I just wonder how the performance would be when you have a large Employees table. Is this the recommended method to do it?
Best regards,
Andre Guerreiro Neto
Database Analyst http://www.softplan.com.br MCITPx1/MCTSx2
|
|
|
|
|
SSChasing Mays
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:45 AM
Points: 616,
Visits: 97
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSC-Enthusiastic
      
Group: General Forum Members
Last Login: Today @ 12:18 AM
Points: 152,
Visits: 155
|
|
very simple question but i got wrong answer.... little confusion
Manik You cannot get to the top by sitting on your bottom.
|
|
|
|