xsevensinzx - Friday, March 23, 2018 6:12 AM
Thanks for your response.
I understand the point of local repos and keeping developer activity separated. My points about one DB per repo was just about automated CI tools that rebuild all databases in a commit - if they are in the repo they are implied in the commit is my understanding).
We wont be re purposing the application; the current setup of the source code folders is a purely arbitrary structure from the top as a Function ID, with database and ETL nested in separate sub folders. These need to be pivoted out to ETL and Database at the top with Function ID repeated within those new top level starting points containing the relevant objects. That's the bulk of what we have.
However I'm sure I will discover the outlier software soon enough and also the gnarly facts of seeding a large codebase into Bitbucket from scratch.