|
| Featured Contents |
| Question of the Day |
| The Voice of the DBA |
A Worse Computer; A Better Car A few weeks ago, my wife and I purchased a Lucid Gravity for our second EV. We've owned a Tesla for almost five years, and it has been an amazing car. However, we decided that we spend a lot of time driving, and we wanted something a little more luxurious. The Tesla has a bit of a stiff ride, and it's not quite as lush a car as some others EVs that have come out since we bought our Model Y. After trying a few different brands, we were excited by the Lucid and decided to get one. Like the Tesla Model Y, this is really a computer on wheels. A lot of software and screens drive the vehicle, though it's not quite as minimalist as a Tesla vehicle. There are physical buttons and controls in various places, and more than one screen. Some things work better, and I like that. However, some things are worse. While researching online to learn about the car, we saw someone post this: The Lucid is a better car, but a worse computer. The Tesla is a better computer but worse car. I agree with that. One thing I've learned in owning two and other modern computerized vehicles is that software is hard. Even something as basic as Bluetooth can be a hassle and operate inconsistently in different vehicles. I've also learned that product managers and engineers don't always think deeply about the end-user experience. Perhaps the Lucid developers are under pressure to get features out, but it seems that I've encountered more than a few things that could (should?) have been built differently. Or would have if a little more thought were given to the end-user experience, especially given how easily software can be configured with toggles and switches. I'm always amazed when more things aren't switchable in software. Yes, I know software takes time, and it is hard. My tenure at Redgate has given me appreciation for the challenges of deciding what to build, test, and release. I'll write about some of the Lucid decisions on my blog, as there are a few things from the software development perspective that make me scratch my head. It's not just me, as I've known people who have had Fords, Cadillacs, and Volvos who complained to no end about their teething pains with the software. A few were ready to abandon the cars. I don't feel that way, and I know I'm an early adopter. I have some tolerance and patience for the things I think aren't built well. Overall, the car is amazing, very comfortable, and brings a smile to my face, but there are a few software conveniences I got used to in the Tesla that are missing in the Lucid. It's definitely a worse computer. But a much, much nicer car. And, as the delivery guy noted, this is the worst version of the car I bought. It will only get better over time. If you think about a Lucid, use my referral link. We'll both get some credit. Steve Jones - SSC Editor Join the debate, and respond to today's editorial on the forums |
| Featured Contents |
