SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


HAVING EXISTS


HAVING EXISTS

Author
Message
Hugo Kornelis
Hugo Kornelis
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 34606 Visits: 13122
Bradley Deem (9/8/2010)
In regards to your practice application example, assuming I understand the requirement, I believe there is a mistake in the having clause. See the comment in the first select statement.

You are absolutely right. Sorry for that mistake, and thanks for posting the corrected script.


Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server/Data Platform MVP (2006-2016)
Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
TSycamore
TSycamore
Grasshopper
Grasshopper (18 reputation)Grasshopper (18 reputation)Grasshopper (18 reputation)Grasshopper (18 reputation)Grasshopper (18 reputation)Grasshopper (18 reputation)Grasshopper (18 reputation)Grasshopper (18 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 18 Visits: 42
Good question, but there's an error in the explanation of the answer. At the end, it should say "with a maximum for TheValue of less than 3", not "less than 2".
sknox
sknox
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (7K reputation)SSCertifiable (7K reputation)SSCertifiable (7K reputation)SSCertifiable (7K reputation)SSCertifiable (7K reputation)SSCertifiable (7K reputation)SSCertifiable (7K reputation)SSCertifiable (7K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 6985 Visits: 3161
Tony Bater (9/8/2010)
In a recent blog, Kalen Delaney said she is frequently asked why is there a need to understand the internals of SQL Server. I think this question illustrates why. The key to getting the right answer is an understanding of the sequence of events during the query processing - the HAVING clause is processed after the GROUP BY and acts on the result set from the earlier phases.

I learned this from Itzik Ben-Gan's book 'Inside Microsoft SQL Server 2008: T-SQL Querying'. Chapter 1, Logical Query Processing, has a great section on the sequence of events that occurs when the query processor gets to work. I really recommend this book to anyone who is struggling to understand the explanation for this QotD.


Strictly speaking, this is not about the internals of SQL Server, but about the logical stucture of T-SQL. First and foremost, you need to understand the logical schema, because that's the only way you can write code that fits the schema, as well as tell if a given coding problem is your error or Microsoft's :-P

The primary reason to understand the internals of SQL Server comes after that -- so you can know how to write queries that are not only logically correct, but that will perform well within the constraints of SQL Server and your environment.

In other words, you learn the logical process to write code that works, and then learn the actual internal process so you can write code that works well.

(Disclaimer: I got the question wrong, because I have much to learn about both subjects Hehe )
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (145K reputation)SSC Guru (145K reputation)SSC Guru (145K reputation)SSC Guru (145K reputation)SSC Guru (145K reputation)SSC Guru (145K reputation)SSC Guru (145K reputation)SSC Guru (145K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 145539 Visits: 18652
Excellent Question

Jason...AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
_______________________________________________
I have given a name to my pain...MCM SQL Server, MVP
SQL RNNR
Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw
Learn Extended Events

Dennissinned
Dennissinned
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1174 Visits: 289
WOW Hugo. Thanks for the question. Really had me thinking.
jlennartz
jlennartz
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1152 Visits: 1197
That made my head swim. I was really confused after the explaination but as usual the discussion cleared it up. Thanks everyone.
Kangana Beri
Kangana Beri
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1514 Visits: 954
Great question! Thanks.
wbeaton-664441
wbeaton-664441
Say Hey Kid
Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)Say Hey Kid (680 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 680 Visits: 714
Great question!
webrunner
webrunner
SSCoach
SSCoach (16K reputation)SSCoach (16K reputation)SSCoach (16K reputation)SSCoach (16K reputation)SSCoach (16K reputation)SSCoach (16K reputation)SSCoach (16K reputation)SSCoach (16K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 16906 Visits: 4141
dbowlin (9/8/2010)
QoTD has really been kicking my butt the last couple of weeks. I had to reread the explanation a couple of times to understand it. Good question, thanks.


Ditto. I'm getting some of them right, but Hugo really has my number. He posts some great questions, and invariably I get them wrong, but in this case I am going to have to study not only his original explanation but also the example he posted in the discussion (above). I don't understand it yet and I really want to.

Thanks, Hugo!

- webrunner

-------------------
A SQL query walks into a bar and sees two tables. He walks up to them and says Can I join you?
Ref.: http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2009/02/sql-joke.html
Tom Thomson
Tom Thomson
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (51K reputation)SSC Guru (51K reputation)SSC Guru (51K reputation)SSC Guru (51K reputation)SSC Guru (51K reputation)SSC Guru (51K reputation)SSC Guru (51K reputation)SSC Guru (51K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 51028 Visits: 13159
Really good fun question. Thanks Hugo.

I looked at it for a bit and concluded that if it didn't generate an error message then it should return the three groups with no 3 in them. Would it generate an error? Well, why should it? Having needs a logical condition expression, so an "exists" expression should be OK as long as it obeys the rules for all logical condition expressions in a Having clause (ie don't refer to an non-aggregated column attribute of a row contributing to the group other that one of the grouping attributes). But it took me a while to convince myself that banning "Having Exists" would be silly, in fact I wasn't 100% certain so I was relieved when the website told me I had gotten it correct.

Tom

Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum








































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search