SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Flash


Flash

Author
Message
James Rochez
James Rochez
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)SSCommitted (1.5K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1547 Visits: 824
NAND Flash is typically guaranteed to have 1,000,000 erase/write cycles per block. This doesn't mean you can only write to them 1,000,000 times. They are organized to have several pages per block so the wear leveling algorithms try to spread the number of writes to evenly among all of the blocks. Using a SDD for something like tempdb that is very write intensive is about the quickest way to wear one out. Using a SDD for something like an operating system which is typically only read from and not written to often is the best way to avoid any wear issues.

The fact that there is no mechanical head to move around and no spinning platter to wait for greatly improves the seek time over a HDD so fragmentation is not an issue. In fact, defragmenting a SDD should be avoid to conserver the number of erase/write cycles and extend the life of the Flash.



Steve Jones
Steve Jones
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 63542 Visits: 19115
I'm not sure I agree with Gus about next year, but I could be wrong. There's still a substantial premium for drives.

I bought a 1TB drive for US$147 yesterday. A 64GB SSD from Dell is $559 today. I see CDW selling an "Enterprise 64GB drive" for $2k

That's a lot of ground to make up.

However I do think Gus is right that at some point we'll see these used as the primary storage for many servers. I think with slowed refresh cycles (4-5 years instead of 3) and the economy, not to mention the need to evolve, I still think we're talking 8-10 years before it's in lots of SMBs.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
GSquared
GSquared
SSC-Insane
SSC-Insane (23K reputation)SSC-Insane (23K reputation)SSC-Insane (23K reputation)SSC-Insane (23K reputation)SSC-Insane (23K reputation)SSC-Insane (23K reputation)SSC-Insane (23K reputation)SSC-Insane (23K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 23783 Visits: 9730
Steve, we're actually agreeing on all points.

Judging by the price/capacity curve on SSDs over the last 10 years, I think viability for SMBs is probably 2-3 years off as a general replacement for HDDs. I'm saying it could be as early as next year, but that's more a hedge-your-bets kind of statement. After all, December of next year is a year and half off, and that's a full doubling cycling for solid-state circuitry, which means it's in the realm of possibility.

But, even with "available and realistic" in 2-3 years, that means it'll just trickle into systems at that point. It's not a sexy enough technology that it'll get any sort of immediate market percentage. That means real market penetration will pretty much be over the replacement cycle of servers and/or SANs and/or internal HDDs. So, 8-10 years for them to be common enough to matter to DBA careers is pretty real.

I think it might be faster than that, but I wouldn't want to put any real odds on it. I think it'll be at the lower end of those figures (closer to 2 years than 3 for viability and closer to 8 years than 10 for at least semi-ubiquity), but not much tighter than that.

- Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETC
Property of The Thread

"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon
Steve Jones
Steve Jones
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)SSC Guru (63K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 63542 Visits: 19115
I think we agree, and you've stated it better than I did.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
kevin77
kevin77
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1823 Visits: 1099
I came across this a couple months ago.

Samsung SSD Awesomeness

It's pretty cool and I wish I could afford something like it.



Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search