SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Sun Invests, IBM Invests, MS ??


Sun Invests, IBM Invests, MS ??

Author
Message
Steve Jones
Steve Jones
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (143K reputation)SSC Guru (143K reputation)SSC Guru (143K reputation)SSC Guru (143K reputation)SSC Guru (143K reputation)SSC Guru (143K reputation)SSC Guru (143K reputation)SSC Guru (143K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 143738 Visits: 19424
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Sun Invests, IBM Invests, MS ??

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
Alan Vogan
Alan Vogan
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1327 Visits: 585
LOL! My wife wouldn't let me move to Seattle either!
w00t
Roddy.CAMERON
Roddy.CAMERON
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 992 Visits: 2606
One missing point on the acquisition front. Microsoft did not actually design and build SQLServer, Sybase did. MS "acquired" it in a round about sort of a way. True, they never purchased Sybase so there was no company acquisition, but the product was pure Sybase up until the time the partnership ended around '94 and MS conveniently owned the appropriate license for developing it on Windows. Ever thought why there is not a Unix/Linux version of it - they don't own the licence to write the code on any platform other than Windows. This acquisition seems to be missing from the list!! Do MS have any software that they actually thought of, designed and built all by themselves??

Although I make these points as a die hard Sybase dba, I actually think SQLServer is a very good products, certainly deserving of second place BigGrin
Vivien Xing
Vivien Xing
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.6K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 3640 Visits: 2204
I was thinking to suggestion a question to Steve. How many SQL instances/databases a DBA supports in average? I found this question is on today’s vote already. So next question could be how many Oracle instances an Oracle DBA support? How about Sybase, MySQL or DB2. I see the number for SQL is at the high end, Sybase as well. Wondering how the other people think and feel.

The numbers show the cost from certain point of view.
RBarryYoung
RBarryYoung
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (34K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 34300 Visits: 9518
FYI: It is my understanding that as of SQL Server 2005, there is no longer any original SyBase code in SQL Server and that the licensing restrictions no longer apply.

-- RBarryYoung, (302)375-0451 blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoung
Proactive Performance Solutions, Inc.
"Performance is our middle name."
Roddy.CAMERON
Roddy.CAMERON
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 992 Visits: 2606
I have to be honest and say I was not aware exactly how the restrictions have changed over the years, and I'm sure you're quite right on this. At least on that basis we can look forward to a version that runs on a real operating system Smile

Seriously though, it's actually a shame that the partnership no longer exists in some ways, and that MS are so hostile towards Sybase. Microsoft and Sybase together would have sown up the database market covering all platforms as they were doing before it all went pear shaped. The underlying design of the 2 products is the best on the market in my opinion, even if they have both now taken their own differing routes. Clearly MS could still take the market lead even with a single platform product, but think what they would do if they covered all the unix systems as well, particularly in the global coporate markets where Windows is less popular as an OS for db servers.
jezemine
jezemine
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1857 Visits: 589
ms would never port sql server to unix or any other os.

sql server drives adoption of the windows server platform, just as halo drives adoption of the xbox.

---------------------------------------
elsasoft.org
Roddy.CAMERON
Roddy.CAMERON
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)SSC Eights! (992 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 992 Visits: 2606
I think you miss my point. I'm not suggesting that MS should or will consider a unix port. I'm making the point about what may have been had MS & Sybase maintained their partnership which offered both a Windows & Unix based product. Combined together as they were, they would almost certainly have had an even greater share of todays market. MS may be very single minded about Windows, but the rest of the world is not. There is a huge market out there who will not use Windows as a host platform for servers, and MS chose to turn their back on that market. For a company so obviously focused on their own success, that is a strange business decision to have made.
Matt Miller (4)
Matt Miller (4)
One Orange Chip
One Orange Chip (28K reputation)One Orange Chip (28K reputation)One Orange Chip (28K reputation)One Orange Chip (28K reputation)One Orange Chip (28K reputation)One Orange Chip (28K reputation)One Orange Chip (28K reputation)One Orange Chip (28K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 28857 Visits: 19002
It is a shame that they're all centralized up in Redmond. I can kind of understand why, but still - it seems like it could use having multiple dev teams, or decentralized. I mean - what's TFS for if you can't decentralize (hehe - couldn't help the dig)....

Besides - there's such a lovely Microsoft office right down the street from here....

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your lack of planning does not constitute an emergency on my part...unless you're my manager...or a director and above...or a really loud-spoken end-user..All right - what was my emergency again?
Peter Shire
Peter Shire
SSC Journeyman
SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)SSC Journeyman (99 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 99 Visits: 140
Steve,

Encouraging the community to contribute and help improve SQL Server is great for everyone. I think the community is one of reasons the product continues to grow so dynamically. Allow me to highlight another area that has tremendous potential to improve SQL Server and the workload borne by SQL Server professionals; third party software. The tools and applications created by independent software vendors are helping to bring innovation, efficiency and more to SQL Server DBAs and Developers around the world. The “roll up your sleeves” attitude that has helped build the SQL Server community is now facing the challenge of ever increasing workload. I would like to encourage the community to take a moment and check for third party software to tackle some of those daily chores they face with SQL Server. Sure, there is a pride of ownership in crafting your own solutions to a problem. Remember to ask yourself “is this an efficient use of my time” or could I be focusing on more strategic work and grow my skills.

Thanks,
Peter Shire
SQL Sentry, Inc.
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search