## total time difference between more than two dates

 Author Message meenu.monu SSC-Enthusiastic Group: General Forum Members Points: 149 Visits: 24 advance thanks to all...can anybody helpme soon...........i am using sql server 2005........i want to find out time difference between more than two dates in HH,MM,SS format.and i want to find out total time difference of all timeeg first i want the time difference of these two dates02/Nov/06 9:14:21 AM19/Apr/07 11:52:31 AM second i want the time difference of these two dates02/dec/07 12:14:21 AM19/jan/08 5:52:31 AM 3rd i want to find out the total time difference now i am using this calculation in my procedure is as follows...but i think this is wrong...if we will seperatly calculate like this wrong i am gettingset @totaltravelHr=datediff(HH,@datediff1,@datediff2)set @totaltravelMI=datediff(MI,@datediff1,@datediff2)set @totaltravelSE=datediff(SS,@datediff1,@datediff2) can anybody help me soon??????????regards Jeff Moden SSC Guru Group: General Forum Members Points: 511658 Visits: 44297 DateDiff and DateAdd have the tendency to round to whatever the "date part" is and, despite what many folks think, shouldn't be used to calculate what the difference between full dates and times are. Instead, simple subtraction should be used. For example...`--===== Declare a couple of test variables to hold test dataDECLARE @DateStart DATETIMEDECLARE @DateEnd DATETIME--===== Preset the test variables with test data SELECT @DateStart = '02/Nov/06 9:14:21 AM', @DateEnd = '19/Apr/07 11:52:31 AM'--===== Calculate and display the difference of date/time between -- the two test variables SELECT @DateEnd-@DateStart AS [Difference between dates]Difference between dates ------------------------------------------------------ 1900-06-18 02:38:10.000(1 row(s) affected)`Of course, the problem with that is that we're displaying the difference using SQL Server's default format. It's hard for people to look at that and say "Hmmmm... that's 6 months, 18 days, 2 hours, 38 minutes, and 10 seconds difference. The code did the trick in calculating correctly, it's just not displayed in a manner easily understood by humans.Teaching a man to fish... you're gonna have to trust me on this... Books On Line says that the underlying datatype for DATETIME is actually two integers that represent the number of days since 1900-01-01 00:00:00.000 AM (also known as "day zero"). DATETIMEs most correctly convert to FLOAT for math purposes. Just as in any type of math, half a day (12 noon, 1/2 of a day) would be represented by the decimal value of .5000000 and 6PM (3/4 of a day) would be represented by .75. So, in reality, the DATETIME datatype keeps track of the "Number of decimal fractional days". Midnight on 1900-01-02 would have the value of 1.000000 and noon on 1900-01-02 would have the value of 1.5...... you with me, so far? Ok... back to the mathematical difference between dates and times...Let's see what happens if we convert the difference between @DateStart and @DateEnd using some simpler date/times so we can follow along in our heads... and lets display the difference as the number of fractional days instead of letting SQL Server have it's way with us...`--===== Declare a couple of test variables to hold test dataDECLARE @DateStart DATETIMEDECLARE @DateEnd DATETIME--===== Preset the test variables with test data SELECT @DateStart = '2000-01-01 00:00:00 AM', --Midnight @DateEnd = '2000-01-02 12:00:00 PM' --Noon the next day--===== Calculate and display the difference of date/time between -- the two test variables as a floating point number SELECT CAST(@DateEnd-@DateStart AS FLOAT)`In our heads, we can see that if we start at midnight on one day and go to noon the next day, that's a day and a half or 1.5... kinda proves what I've been saying so far. How can we format that for human consumption? I'm going to show you how, but you have to understand a couple of things...1. This type of formatting should be done in the GUI... repeat after me... "THIS TYPE OF FORMATTING SHOULD BE DONE IN THE GUI". The reason why is because the GUI is better at it, allows for local date/time display settings to come into play, and keeps SQL Server from spending extra clock cycles for formatting (distributed computing... let the client spend the clock cycles instead of the server). If there is no GUI to do the formatting (ie, you're outputing to a file), then the formatting can be done in SQL Server.2. Formatted date/times must never ever be stored in the database. Go ahead... get it into your head now... repeat it over and over. "FORMATTED DATE/TIMES MUST NEVER EVER BE STORED IN THE DATABASE." Stop and think about it... if we store the formatted differences in time in the database, we'll need to spend more clock cycles unformatting (changing back to DATETIME) to do any further calculations like adding up the individual differences to get a "total duration". It's like taking drugs... "Just say NO".Promise yourself that you'll obey the two rules above... they will make you a much better SQL Developer than you'll know. They are two base rules to doing things right in any form of SQL.Ok, back to your problems... Depending on what your requirements are, there are several ways to format a difference between dates/times (also known as "DeltaT" which is what I'll call it from now on). Let's assume that you want to display in the following format... ddddd DAYS(s) hh:mi:ss. In the example above, we'll need to display the whole portion of the number 1.5 as "1 DAY(s)"... and, we'll need to display the decimal portion as time as "12:00:00".We'll do this in pieces and then put it all together...For formatting the number of days, we need to take the following steps.1. Calculate the DeltaT2. Convert the DeltaT to FLOAT3. Use only the whole day portion being careful to not round up4. Convert the whole day portion to a character datatype so we can concatenate it to the word "DAY(s)". We also need to right justify the number so displays of other DeltaTs will line up for easy reading.5. Concatenate the result with the word "DAY(S)"Sounds really complicated, but it's simple, short, and can be done using a single formula...`--===== Declare a couple of test variables to hold test dataDECLARE @DateStart DATETIMEDECLARE @DateEnd DATETIME--===== Preset the test variables with test data SELECT @DateStart = '2000-01-01 00:00:00 AM', --Midnight @DateEnd = '2000-01-02 12:00:00 PM' --Noon the next day--===== Calculate and display the difference in days SELECT STR(FLOOR(CAST(@DateEnd-@DateStart AS FLOAT)),5) + ' DAY(s)'`Here's what the different pieces of code do... like any good math problem, we start from the inside parenthesis...1. Calculate the DeltaT @DateEnd-@DateStart 2. Convert the DeltaT to FLOAT (using CAST) CAST(@DateEnd-@DateStart AS FLOAT)3. Use only the whole day portion being careful to not round up (using FLOOR) FLOOR(CAST(@DateEnd-@DateStart AS FLOAT))4. Convert the whole day portion to a character datatype so we can concatenate it to the word "DAY(s)". We also need to right justify the number so displays of other DeltaTs will line up for easy reading. (using STR for 5 characters, does the right justify, too!) STR(FLOOR(CAST(@DateEnd-@DateStart AS FLOAT)),5)5. Concatenate the result with the word "DAY(S)" STR(FLOOR(CAST(@DateEnd-@DateStart AS FLOAT)),5) + ' DAY(s) 'That wasn't so bad, was it?Ok, now for the time portion... this is easy...1. Calculate the DeltaT2. Convert the DeltaT to FLOAT3. Use only the decimal portion (ie. fraction day or TIME) being careful not to round4. Convert the decimal portion to something that looks like a TIME and to a character datatype so we can concatenate it to days display we just calculated. We also need to right justify the time displays of other DeltaTs will line up for easy reading.Again, this is simple, short, and can be done using a single formula...`--===== Declare a couple of test variables to hold test dataDECLARE @DateStart DATETIMEDECLARE @DateEnd DATETIME--===== Preset the test variables with test data SELECT @DateStart = '2000-01-01 00:00:00 AM', --Midnight @DateEnd = '2000-01-02 12:00:00 PM' --Noon the next day--===== Calculate and display the TIME SELECT CONVERT(CHAR(8),@DateEnd-@DateStart,108)`Here's what the different pieces of code do... 1. Calculate the DeltaT @DateEnd-@DateStart2. Convert the DeltaT to FLOAT Step not actually needed because we're using the instrinsic date functions of SQL Server to do this.3. Use only the decimal portion (ie. fraction day or TIME) being careful not to round Again, this step not actually needed because we're using the instrinsic date functions of SQL Server to do this.4. Convert the decimal portion to something that looks like a TIME and to a character datatype so we can concatenate it to days display we just calculated. We also need to right justify the time displays of other DeltaTs will line up for easy reading. (using CONVERT) CONVERT(CHAR(8),@DateEnd-@DateStart,108) Heh... guess step 4 takes a bit more explanation... CONVERT is the command to do steps 2, 3, 4. The CHAR(8) is the data type that we want the result to be (8 characters to hold the 8 character format of hh:mi:ss). The 108 is the format number I got from Books Online (lookup CONVERT) that will give me the hh:mi:ss format in 24 hour time. Since the 108 format only deals with the time portion of the DeltaT, theres no need to convert to FLOAT and no need to strip of the number of whole days. Ok... now, using the lessons we just learned, put it all together...`--===== Declare a couple of test variables to hold test dataDECLARE @DateStart DATETIMEDECLARE @DateEnd DATETIME--===== Preset the test variables with test data SELECT @DateStart = '2000-01-01 00:00:00 AM', --Midnight @DateEnd = '2000-01-02 12:00:00 PM' --Noon the next day--===== Calculate and display the DeltaT in the (ddddd DAY(s) hh:mi:ss) format SELECT STR(FLOOR(CAST(@DateEnd-@DateStart AS FLOAT)),5) + ' DAY(s) ' + CONVERT(CHAR(8),@DateEnd-@DateStart,108)`You can just change the values for @DateStart and @DateEnd and your first two problems are solved. Pretty easy, huh? Again, don't even think about storing that garbage result in a perfectly good database... this type of stuff (formatting) is for display purposes only.The same method will work for your third problem... and I'm going to let you do it because I think this is homework and you need to try it on your own. I will give you a couple of hints though... 1. Calculate two DeltaT's... 1 for problem 1 and 1 for problem 22. Add the two DeltaT's together3. Format the resultI know this is a bit long winded, but I saw the opportunity to teach someone something instead of just plopping a code answer out there. You have a bit of study to do to figure out what the individual functions like STR and CONVERT are actually capable of. And, if you have any questions that whose answers aren't in Books Online, feel free to post back. --Jeff ModenRBAR is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.If you think its expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. -- Red Adair Helpful Links:How to post code problemsHow to post performance problemsForum FAQs meenu.monu SSC-Enthusiastic Group: General Forum Members Points: 149 Visits: 24 dear all thanks for ur help....i done this caculation...check this link........http://www.sqlteam.com/article/working-with-time-spans-and-durations-in-sql-server Jeff Moden SSC Guru Group: General Forum Members Points: 511658 Visits: 44297 Cool... if that's what you actually wanted. --Jeff ModenRBAR is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.If you think its expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. -- Red Adair Helpful Links:How to post code problemsHow to post performance problemsForum FAQs RBarryYoung SSC Guru Group: General Forum Members Points: 80760 Visits: 9519 Jeff: I think that's an article. -- RBarryYoung, (302)375-0451 blog: MovingSQL.com, Twitter: @RBarryYoungProactive Performance Solutions, Inc. "Performance is our middle name." Tom Garth Hall of Fame Group: General Forum Members Points: 3505 Visits: 1499 rbarryyoung (4/13/2008)Jeff: I think that's an article.It is an article, and very well written. No editing required. Nice work Jeff. Tom GarthVertical Solutions"There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves." -- Will Rogers GSquared SSC Guru Group: General Forum Members Points: 140263 Visits: 9731 Jeff, good article. Just to add to it, you can do this:`declare @D1 datetime, @D2 datetimeselect @d1 = '02/Nov/06 9:14:21 AM', @d2 = '19/Apr/07 11:52:31 AM'select datepart(year, @d2-@d1)-1900 as years,datepart(month, @d2-@d1) as months,datepart(day, @d2-@d1) as days,datepart(hour, @d2-@d1) as hours,datepart(minute, @d2-@d1) as minutes,datepart(second, @d2-@d1) as seconds`And it will give you a result of how many years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds, are between the two dates provided.Get rid of the "declare...select" part and make those input parameters, and you have a function. Change the variables to columns and you have a set-based function.If you need it, you could also add milliseconds to the final select.The advantage to this one is that it can be used to create calculated columns that can be selected against in a view, indexed, etc., as needed. Doesn't do the string formatting that Jeff's solution does, which is an advantage if you need this for a Where clause, and a very minor disadvantage if you want formatted data.The years part of the calculation can also be used to find age. - Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETCProperty of The Thread"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon Jeff Moden SSC Guru Group: General Forum Members Points: 511658 Visits: 44297 Thanks, guys... I appreciate the feedback...Gus, did you test for rounding errors? --Jeff ModenRBAR is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.If you think its expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. -- Red Adair Helpful Links:How to post code problemsHow to post performance problemsForum FAQs GSquared SSC Guru Group: General Forum Members Points: 140263 Visits: 9731 Well, since dates are stored as floating point numbers, it can have those problems, but there isn't a way around that if you're using datetime data. And it should only have errors in the milliseconds measure.Is there some specific situation you were thinking of? The things I've tested it on seem to be correct. I haven't use this, just thought it was an interesting calculation and might work here.Where it can have problems is if you input the dates backwards and subtract a later date from an earlier date. If you can't protect against that, then it's important to use ABS on the date subtraction.It does have some intersting issues, now that I test it a bit more. For example, I used 1 Jan 1800 and 1 Jan 1901 as the dates, and it came back as 100 years, 12 months, 31 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds, 0 milliseconds.If I modify it to have -1 on the month and day, it gives accurate counts. Hadn't taken into account that Jan != 0. With that correction, it fixes the 100 years, 12 months, 31 days, problem.With that correction, I just tested it on a few dozen dates, and it was right in each case. - Gus "GSquared", RSVP, OODA, MAP, NMVP, FAQ, SAT, SQL, DNA, RNA, UOI, IOU, AM, PM, AD, BC, BCE, USA, UN, CF, ROFL, LOL, ETCProperty of The Thread"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everyone agrees it's old enough to know better." - Anon Jeff Moden SSC Guru Group: General Forum Members Points: 511658 Visits: 44297 GSquared (4/14/2008)Jeff, good article. Just to add to it, you can do this:`declare @D1 datetime, @D2 datetimeselect @d1 = '02/Nov/06 9:14:21 AM', @d2 = '19/Apr/07 11:52:31 AM'select datepart(year, @d2-@d1)-1900 as years,datepart(month, @d2-@d1) as months,datepart(day, @d2-@d1) as days,datepart(hour, @d2-@d1) as hours,datepart(minute, @d2-@d1) as minutes,datepart(second, @d2-@d1) as seconds`And it will give you a result of how many years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds, are between the two dates provided.Get rid of the "declare...select" part and make those input parameters, and you have a function. Change the variables to columns and you have a set-based function.If you need it, you could also add milliseconds to the final select.The advantage to this one is that it can be used to create calculated columns that can be selected against in a view, indexed, etc., as needed. Doesn't do the string formatting that Jeff's solution does, which is an advantage if you need this for a Where clause, and a very minor disadvantage if you want formatted data.The years part of the calculation can also be used to find age.I think it needs just a little tweek, Gus... that's what I meant by a "rounding error" although it's not really a "rounding" error...`declare @D1 datetime, @D2 datetimeselect @d1 = '02/Nov/06 00:00:00AM', @d2 = '02/Nov/06 12:00:00PM'select datepart(year, @d2-@d1)-1900 as years,datepart(month, @d2-@d1) as months,datepart(day, @d2-@d1) as days,datepart(hour, @d2-@d1) as hours,datepart(minute, @d2-@d1) as minutes,datepart(second, @d2-@d1) as secondsyears months days hours minutes seconds ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 0 1 1 12 0 0(1 row(s) affected)` --Jeff ModenRBAR is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.If you think its expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. -- Red Adair Helpful Links:How to post code problemsHow to post performance problemsForum FAQs