I'd have a hard time doing that because Number is a reserved word but to each their own. Also, are you implying that you have two separate tables? One for one-based and the other for zero-based? If so and if the use of BETWEEN is a pain, why not just have a single table starting at zero and a pass-through view with a >0 criteria? The underlying clustered index would still be used in either case.
Also, although I appreciate why you called your tables what you did and why, would it not be less confusing to casual users of your system to call one-based Number1 and zero-based Number0?
is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for R
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.
Although they tell us that they want it real bad, our primary goal is to ensure that we dont actually give it to them that way.
Although change is inevitable, change for the better is not.
Just because you can do something in PowerShell, doesnt mean you should. Helpful Links:
How to post code problemsHow to post performance problemsForum FAQs