SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Auditor Knowledge of Database Environment


Auditor Knowledge of Database Environment

Author
Message
JunkMail Victim
JunkMail Victim
SSC Journeyman
SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 76 Visits: 33

Now that most companies have gone through at least one round of SOX, I'm wondering what everyone's assessment of the auditor's understanding of the database environment is.

I've found them to concentrate on the compiled executables of the client applications, but not think much about the unencrypted business logic that resides in stored procedures and triggers in the database environment. In our case, they seem to think of databases as only data storage, and don't consider how powerful and immediate the environment really is.

There's probably a mosaic of response depending on what auditor companies have had, but I'm curious what everyone's experience has been.

Thanks.


Site Owners
Site Owners
SSChampion
SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)SSChampion (12K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 12701 Visits: 22
No one has responded to this topic yet. Even if you don't have a complete answer, the original poster will appreciate any thoughts you have!
Angel Garcia
Angel Garcia
SSC Rookie
SSC Rookie (33 reputation)SSC Rookie (33 reputation)SSC Rookie (33 reputation)SSC Rookie (33 reputation)SSC Rookie (33 reputation)SSC Rookie (33 reputation)SSC Rookie (33 reputation)SSC Rookie (33 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 33 Visits: 28
seems pretty obvious to me that the auditors we got really have no understanding of what they are asking for. most of things they ask for or find are being read from a list of common best practices in the industry
JunkMail Victim
JunkMail Victim
SSC Journeyman
SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)SSC Journeyman (76 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 76 Visits: 33
The last thing I want to do is push an auditor into doing a deeper audit, but they don't seem to understand tiered architecture. I would agree with you that they're working with a checklist, and don't know when they should look deeper.
Ramon Jimenez
Ramon Jimenez
Right there with Babe
Right there with Babe (757 reputation)Right there with Babe (757 reputation)Right there with Babe (757 reputation)Right there with Babe (757 reputation)Right there with Babe (757 reputation)Right there with Babe (757 reputation)Right there with Babe (757 reputation)Right there with Babe (757 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 757 Visits: 122
I've experienced some auditories, and my conclusion is that in many of the cases auditors don't have a deep knowledge of whatever are they auditing and they are following a checklist.

Regards Ramon
chrisn-585491
chrisn-585491
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.9K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 3934 Visits: 2564
Most auditors are clueless, IMHO. Many times I think they focus on paperwork instead of actually examining the environment.
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 228383 Visits: 46342
Please note: 4 year old thread.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass


Ninja's_RGR'us
Ninja's_RGR'us
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (68K reputation)SSC Guru (68K reputation)SSC Guru (68K reputation)SSC Guru (68K reputation)SSC Guru (68K reputation)SSC Guru (68K reputation)SSC Guru (68K reputation)SSC Guru (68K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 68533 Visits: 9671
GilaMonster (9/13/2010)
Please note: 4 year old thread.



Are they any less clueless now?

Not from what I've seen here.
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)SSC Guru (228K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 228383 Visits: 46342
Ninja's_RGR'us (9/13/2010)
GilaMonster (9/13/2010)
Please note: 4 year old thread.

Are they any less clueless now?

Not from what I've seen here.


Doubt it. That would violate the law of conservation of cluelessness.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass


Eric M Russell
Eric M Russell
One Orange Chip
One Orange Chip (29K reputation)One Orange Chip (29K reputation)One Orange Chip (29K reputation)One Orange Chip (29K reputation)One Orange Chip (29K reputation)One Orange Chip (29K reputation)One Orange Chip (29K reputation)One Orange Chip (29K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 29391 Visits: 11530
JunkMail Victim (9/1/2006)

I've found them to concentrate on the compiled executables of the client applications, but not think much about the unencrypted business logic that resides in stored procedures and triggers inthe database environment. In our case, they seem to think of databases as only data storage, and don't consider how powerful and immediate the environment really is.

The fact that stored procedures, triggers, views and other database objects containing SQL are not encrypted (or at best weakly encrypted) is really not an issue. By default, a user account that is not a member of the DBO or sysadmin role doesn't have VIEW SCHEMA, ALTER TRACE, VIEW SERVER STATE, etc. permission unless you explicitly grant it to them, so they shouldn't be able to see the SQL. A user account for use by the application should be a member of a role that grants them only exec permission on specific stored procedures and maybe access to some tables. That's what the auditor should be looking for.


"The universe is complicated and for the most part beyond your control, but your life is only as complicated as you choose it to be."
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search