SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


SQL 2000 memory recommendations


SQL 2000 memory recommendations

Author
Message
Plateau
Plateau
SSC Rookie
SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 44 Visits: 73
GilaMonster (1/15/2014)
Probably means SQL doesn't need more. If you're not running load on it, it won't use more memory than it needs.

That said, that looks like 32-bit without AWE or /3GB. Is AWE enabled in SQL?


I didn't think it was an option SQL server 2000 standard, I know it is on my 2005 box.

Let me check!
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 88821 Visits: 45284
Right, standard edition.

Standard is hard-capped at 2GB of memory. It can't use more so the other 4GB of memory you have on that server is wasted. So the 1.6GB looks correct, the rest is the mem-to-leave section of memory (non-buffer memory)

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass


Plateau
Plateau
SSC Rookie
SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 44 Visits: 73
GilaMonster (1/15/2014)
Right, standard edition.

Standard is hard-capped at 2GB of memory. It can't use more so the other 4GB of memory you have on that server is wasted. So the 1.6GB looks correct, the rest is the mem-to-leave section of memory (non-buffer memory)


Oh well - may as well move some of that memory to the other VM then.

Will probably decrease the memory down to 4GB. At least the OS won't be low!

Thanks for your help
Plateau
Plateau
SSC Rookie
SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 44 Visits: 73
I have my test & development environments on this VM too - so figure I'm better moving these to a new box and at least allowing the live environment to keep the whole 2Gb.

D
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)SSC Guru (88K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 88821 Visits: 45284
I'm not a fan of dev and prod on the same server (mess up dev and you can take prod down), but don't move just on account of memory, each instance of Standard edition can use up to 2GB of memory total.

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass


Plateau
Plateau
SSC Rookie
SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)SSC Rookie (44 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 44 Visits: 73
GilaMonster (1/15/2014)
I'm not a fan of dev and prod on the same server (mess up dev and you can take prod down), but don't move just on account of memory, each instance of Standard edition can use up to 2GB of memory total.


I had wanted to minimise the number of operating systems we had that were out of support. But I guess 1 vs 2 2K servers is not much of worse place to be in.
- We get scored down on audits for this.

In an ideal world would look to try and improve the querying done by the application, but it's on freeze at the moment and hopefully within 12 months will be retired - so just make things better for the users is the goal (i.e. stop the timeouts!)

Thanks again Gail
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search