Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Recharge and Relax


Recharge and Relax

Author
Message
jarick 15608
jarick 15608
Valued Member
Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)Valued Member (53 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 53 Visits: 465
GeorgeCopeland (10/23/2013)
Ian Massi (10/23/2013)
I've heard that in some places it's mandatory to take at least a week at a time at least once a year in order to make sure that you haven't become mission critical.


That sounds like a brilliant policy. I take it a step further. Every job that I have had, I have tried to eliminate it - improve processes and documentation so that my job becomes unnecessary. Everytime I am successful at this, they just give me more to do.


I always try to automate to the point that I even try to train my replacement. There are so many "empire builders" who keep their little secrets close to their vests. I've worked with a lot of those and they end up in the same job for like 20 years!! I want to grow and take on other projects, not maintain the same systems util I am retired along with that system. w00t
LightVader
LightVader
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 819 Visits: 2893
jarick 15608 (10/23/2013)
GeorgeCopeland (10/23/2013)
Ian Massi (10/23/2013)
I've heard that in some places it's mandatory to take at least a week at a time at least once a year in order to make sure that you haven't become mission critical.


That sounds like a brilliant policy. I take it a step further. Every job that I have had, I have tried to eliminate it - improve processes and documentation so that my job becomes unnecessary. Everytime I am successful at this, they just give me more to do.


I always try to automate to the point that I even try to train my replacement. There are so many "empire builders" who keep their little secrets close to their vests. I've worked with a lot of those and they end up in the same job for like 20 years!! I want to grow and take on other projects, not maintain the same systems util I am retired along with that system. w00t


That's a really good point. Where I work now, we ended up with empires because the IT group is relatively small. We're working towards expanding who has knowledge of which systems and making sure that everyone has a backup so they can actually take some time off.



The opinions expressed herein are strictly personal and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of my employer.
DavidL
DavidL
SSC-Enthusiastic
SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (172 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 172 Visits: 756
LightVader (10/23/2013)
jarick 15608 (10/23/2013)
GeorgeCopeland (10/23/2013)
Ian Massi (10/23/2013)
I've heard that in some places it's mandatory to take at least a week at a time at least once a year in order to make sure that you haven't become mission critical.


That sounds like a brilliant policy. I take it a step further. Every job that I have had, I have tried to eliminate it - improve processes and documentation so that my job becomes unnecessary. Everytime I am successful at this, they just give me more to do.


I always try to automate to the point that I even try to train my replacement. There are so many "empire builders" who keep their little secrets close to their vests. I've worked with a lot of those and they end up in the same job for like 20 years!! I want to grow and take on other projects, not maintain the same systems util I am retired along with that system. w00t


That's a really good point. Where I work now, we ended up with empires because the IT group is relatively small. We're working towards expanding who has knowledge of which systems and making sure that everyone has a backup so they can actually take some time off.


Big thumbs up to this. I also try as much as I can to automate and develop process so I can off load things. Because the complexity and importance of the projects have always grown, even when I am loathe to give up something interesting in the end it has always been for the best. What I was trying to solve 5 years ago, for instance, would bore me to tears if I had to do it now.

On the topic of vacations, I firmly believe we undervalue them in this country (U.S.). I try to set an example by taking all that I have accrued, and NEVER saying no to a request from one of my team. This means that there has to be enough overlap in our skills that this is possible, and ensuring this is possible I view as one of my principal responsibilities to the company as a manager. As was mentioned in an earlier post, if a person can't take a one week vacation it means they have become 'mission critical', which in my view is a management failure (read -- my failure). My standard is actually a two week vacation, not one.



Nevyn
Nevyn
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 960 Visits: 3149
Apologies for wading into the "IT union" side discussion, but I have to agree that a union is not really an ideal fit in general for developers and DBAs.

And its certainly not something I'd be tempted to do just to score some more vacation time.

I think I'd dislike the union dues, stress of collective bargaining, lack of accountability, and primacy of seniority relative to competence more than I'd like the extra vacation days. Not to mention the potential negative impact on company performance and adaptability.

Unions have their place. There are some jobs and industries where without them, employees could (and/or) have been squeezed to barely liveable conditions without them. But they are not a good fit everywhere, not a good solution to every "my pay/benefits suck" problem.
djackson 22568
djackson 22568
Right there with Babe
Right there with Babe (739 reputation)Right there with Babe (739 reputation)Right there with Babe (739 reputation)Right there with Babe (739 reputation)Right there with Babe (739 reputation)Right there with Babe (739 reputation)Right there with Babe (739 reputation)Right there with Babe (739 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 739 Visits: 1176
Nevyn (10/23/2013)
Apologies for wading into the "IT union" side discussion, but I have to agree that a union is not really an ideal fit in general for developers and DBAs.

And its certainly not something I'd be tempted to do just to score some more vacation time.

I think I'd dislike the union dues, stress of collective bargaining, lack of accountability, and primacy of seniority relative to competence more than I'd like the extra vacation days. Not to mention the potential negative impact on company performance and adaptability.

Unions have their place. There are some jobs and industries where without them, employees could (and/or) have been squeezed to barely liveable conditions without them. But they are not a good fit everywhere, not a good solution to every "my pay/benefits suck" problem.


I am NOT a pro union person in any way, most people consider me anti-union.

My main issue with unions is that they don't adhere to what they should be doing, and frequently violate laws and get away with it. For example, it is against federal law for the teacher's union to engage in politics, but we all know they do and it is ignored.

That said, what I see as the value to unions is to ensure fair pay and benefits, and to ensure that workers are not abused, and that in cases where companies have no choice but to ask people to work more than they should, the employees are compensated fairly. Meaning an employee being paid $40 an hour, should be getting $60 an hour for any hours over 40 in a week, sometimes over 8 in a day.

The other side of the coin is that our profession should see a variety of wage levels due to the differences in intelligence, technical knowledge, and capabilities of workers. An entry level IT worker in any discipline could potentially be a star already. Frequently our most senior people in a number of disciplines are incapable of doing the most basic things. Fair pay means looking at productivity and quality. Unions are better suited to assembly line work where everyone produces the same quantity and quality - IT isn't like that.

Still, how many of us work for companies where everyone is paid the same, everyone gets the same bonus, everyone is looked at as being no better or worse than their co-workers? In my experience, companies have taken IT workers and forced them through the round hole that is "office workers" and view us the same way. Sure, some IT workers are idiots, some shouldn't be in the field, but a large number of IT workers (maybe everyone reading this?) excel at what we do and make an effort to produce the best quality work we can possibly produce.

So, unions or not? I don't know. I don't like them, but at this point I don't see them hurting a lot of IT workers in a lot of companies. I imagine there are some of you who would be hurt, and I would never want to force someone to join if they did not want to, but unions don't believe in options. My preference is to find a way to ensure we are compensated fairly, given appropriate time out of work to be ourselves, and to not be asked to work 60 hour weeks every week, without true vacation time, and not being paid for the hours we put in. All of that without the downside of unions. I have no idea how to make that happen. This is a brilliant group - someone will figure it out.

Dave
below86
below86
SSChasing Mays
SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 634 Visits: 2121
Great points Dave. I was just looking at it from a benefits side, not salary. Just trying to think of a way to help those who don't.

I would like to pose a question more related to Steve's comments on vacation. I know I was the one who opened that can of worms on unions. ;-)

How much of a salary decrease would you take for more vacation? Using Dave's number say you are making $40 an hour, for a 40 hour week thats $1,600. Would you take a decrease in your salary of $1,600 or more for another week of vacation?

I think I would. That amount, or equivalent to my salary isn't going to put me into any financial trouble. And I would enjoy my time away more than I would that money.

-------------------------------------------------------------
we travel not to escape life but for life not to escape us
LightVader
LightVader
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)SSC Eights! (819 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 819 Visits: 2893
below86 (10/23/2013)
<snip>

How much of a salary decrease would you take for more vacation? Using Dave's number say you are making $40 an hour, for a 40 hour week thats $1,600. Would you take a decrease in your salary of $1,600 or more for another week of vacation?

I think I would. That amount, or equivalent to my salary isn't going to put me into any financial trouble. And I would enjoy my time away more than I would that money.


I think that depends on how many days you start with. Right now I get 20 days, plus 11 holidays and some sick days. I don't think I would give up any of my salary for more time off. There's no issue financially, but with where I am in life right now, I don't think I could use more time. If I had a family that I was missing time with it would be a different story.

The previous company I worked for you could choose between overtime pay or comp time when you worked extra hours. I think that was a nice policy.



The opinions expressed herein are strictly personal and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of my employer.
Coozie
Coozie
SSC Rookie
SSC Rookie (47 reputation)SSC Rookie (47 reputation)SSC Rookie (47 reputation)SSC Rookie (47 reputation)SSC Rookie (47 reputation)SSC Rookie (47 reputation)SSC Rookie (47 reputation)SSC Rookie (47 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 47 Visits: 354
Steve,
How many times have you ever heard anyone lying on their death-bed speak the words, "I wish I would've worked more."

I'm guessing none.

Have a good time!
Mark Cusano
Nevyn
Nevyn
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)SSC Eights! (960 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 960 Visits: 3149

How much of a salary decrease would you take for more vacation? Using Dave's number say you are making $40 an hour, for a 40 hour week thats $1,600. Would you take a decrease in your salary of $1,600 or more for another week of vacation?


So basically you are asking people if they'd take a weeks unpaid vacation?
below86
below86
SSChasing Mays
SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)SSChasing Mays (634 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 634 Visits: 2121
Nevyn (10/23/2013)

How much of a salary decrease would you take for more vacation? Using Dave's number say you are making $40 an hour, for a 40 hour week thats $1,600. Would you take a decrease in your salary of $1,600 or more for another week of vacation?


So basically you are asking people if they'd take a weeks unpaid vacation?


Yes, but instead of having one less or smaller check it would be less throughout the year. My wife has less vacation time than I have and I would love for her boss to let her do this. I would rather have that time together than the extra $133 a month in this example.

We used to have 'comp' time for anything worked over 40 hours. Senior management found out about it many years ago and put an end to it. :-(

-------------------------------------------------------------
we travel not to escape life but for life not to escape us
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search