SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


The Reorg


The Reorg

Author
Message
David.Poole
David.Poole
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)SSCertifiable (7.6K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 7623 Visits: 3286
Jeff Moden (7/14/2013)

What I'd like to see is for MS to get back to some grass roots programming to make T-SQL what it should/could be. For example, fix Bulk Insert and BCP .....Make a Bulk Export that's as easy to use as Bulk Insert. Stop farting around .....fix PIVOT so that it's at least as it is in Access.


YES!!!!!!!

I'd also like to see crystal clear, unambiguous licencing that doesn't require a team of lawyers to understand.

I wish they'd port SQL Server to Linux but that is unlikely to happen. I'm seeing all our web servers and app servers in an accelerating move to Linux so we end up with a huge Linux estate and the remaining Windows servers are SQL Server. The inevitable will happen. "The rest of our estate is on Linux, find a DB platform that runs on Linux".

LinkedIn Profile

Newbie on www.simple-talk.com
chrisn-585491
chrisn-585491
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1958 Visits: 2437
"The rest of our estate is on Linux, find a DB platform that runs on Linux".


PostgreSQL is cross platform, but I don't think it has as many features nor the community that SQL Server has. However I'm using it on my Linux boxes.
GoofyGuy
GoofyGuy
SSChasing Mays
SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 627 Visits: 971
We have a number of MySql installations, which have multiplied quite a bit over the last few years. I started using it in another shop about 10 years ago, and although its feature set always seems to lag SQL Server's by a year or two, I like its ease of use, community support, and unambiguous licencing (it's a free Open Source product).

I'm increasingly uncertain about Microsoft's future, and having an Open Source alternative RDBMS seems to make sense to me. Not all the eggs need to go in one basket.
stefano.bozzoni
stefano.bozzoni
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)Forum Newbie (5 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 5 Visits: 20
I totally agree. I guess that the reason why Microsoft is like that is because they have to please shareholders more then clients. Shareholders are amazed and can understand only profits, no technological stuff.
I am a software developer and Microsoft has often filled their languages with useless stuff while has left out more important things, like, for example, supporting more about database components. Other software houses, like borland, even if it copes with smaller market, have done it better in my opinion. Microsoft has a better marketing vision and that's why it is a big firm.
Steve Jones
Steve Jones
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 62801 Visits: 19111
stefano.bozzoni (7/22/2013)
I totally agree. I guess that the reason why Microsoft is like that is because they have to please shareholders more then clients. Shareholders are amazed and can understand only profits, no technological stuff.
I am a software developer and Microsoft has often filled their languages with useless stuff while has left out more important things, like, for example, supporting more about database components. Other software houses, like borland, even if it copes with smaller market, have done it better in my opinion. Microsoft has a better marketing vision and that's why it is a big firm.


I guess. This is why, to a large extent, I hate when founders leave businesses. They become less of a business/company and more of just an investment.

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
TomThomson
TomThomson
SSChampion
SSChampion (14K reputation)SSChampion (14K reputation)SSChampion (14K reputation)SSChampion (14K reputation)SSChampion (14K reputation)SSChampion (14K reputation)SSChampion (14K reputation)SSChampion (14K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 14328 Visits: 12197
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (7/22/2013)
stefano.bozzoni (7/22/2013)
I totally agree. I guess that the reason why Microsoft is like that is because they have to please shareholders more then clients. Shareholders are amazed and can understand only profits, no technological stuff.
I am a software developer and Microsoft has often filled their languages with useless stuff while has left out more important things, like, for example, supporting more about database components. Other software houses, like borland, even if it copes with smaller market, have done it better in my opinion. Microsoft has a better marketing vision and that's why it is a big firm.


I guess. This is why, to a large extent, I hate when founders leave businesses. They become less of a business/company and more of just an investment.

The change in Microsoft happened long before BG left. If I remember correctly, he was full-time at MS until some time in 2006.
When MS was a technology company, it wrote compilers for all sorts of platforms - for example AppleSoft Basic was Microsoft's Basic for the mac, licensed to Apple for peanuts, released by Apple in 1977, on floppy disc as it was too late to be included in ROM in the first Apple release, and in Rom on Apple II plus in 1979 and all subsequent macs with ROM-based basic; this MS basic was essential to Apple's survival - Wozniak's Integer Basic was a pretty poor offering, fine for some uses of simple toys on which no-one wanted serious programing ability, but not really adequate to satisfy even the toy computer market, and was relegated to Floppy Disc from Apple II plus onwards, and stayed on Floppy disc on the Apple machines while Microsoft's code went into Apple's ROM. This ensured that people recognised that MS was a good (and cheap) source of compilers and interpreters, which was a view which Ms could have exploited. If MS had taken the same attitude to SQL Server as it had to Basic earlier on, we might have seen UNIX-based versions of SQL Server: of course, it may be that the terms of the Sybase deal precluded that. But so far as I'm aware none of MS C++, C#, and F# have been released other than on the windows platform, which suggests that the idea of spreading the expertise across platforms had died certainly before 2006 and equally certainly well before 2000 (when Gates moved from the CEO position to Chairman). So the "we are a software technology company" seems to have turned into "we are the windows company, and windows pays dividends" long before Gates retired from MS.

Tom

GoofyGuy
GoofyGuy
SSChasing Mays
SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)SSChasing Mays (627 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 627 Visits: 971
... the "we are a software technology company" seems to have turned into "we are the Windows company, and Windows pays dividends" long before Gates retired from MS.

Which reminds me of an old saying: 'Milk the cow, but do not pull off the udder'.

Microsoft now faces udder catastrophe.
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 32461 Visits: 18556
Most of all I wish Microsoft would go back to being a technology company, with a focus on cool, exciting technology, with a leader that appreciates, uses, and understands how exciting technology can be.


I agree.

Microsoft is too busy with Marketing and seems to have lost sight on the tech factor.



Jason AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server, MVP


SQL RNNR

Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw

Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search