SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Out of the two given queries, which will perform faster!!!


Out of the two given queries, which will perform faster!!!

Author
Message
T.Ashish
T.Ashish
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1365 Visits: 607
Out of the two given queries, which will perform faster!!!

1. Query(1)
SELECT
TOP 1000 first_name + ' ' + last_name AS display_name,
person_id,
company_code
FROM
person

2. Query(2)
SELECT
TOP 1000
CASE WHEN
charindex('(', first_name + ' ' + last_name) > 0
THEN
(LEFT (first_name + ' ' + last_name, CHARINDEX('(',first_name + ' ' + last_name) -1))
ELSE
first_name + ' ' + last_name
END
AS display_name,
person_id,
company_code
FROM
person
Lowell
Lowell
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 72885 Visits: 40959
they are the same query, but with a some expressions to calculate the field values.
test it yourself by looking at the actual execution plans when you run them.

they will both be table scans (clustered index scan if there is a clustered index) because there is no WHERE statement,

even worse, the TOP 1000 has no ORDER BY, so the results could vary on the very next pass if any data changed, or any reindexing occurred.
TOP does not guarantee repeatable results without an ORDER BY.

Lowell
--help us help you! If you post a question, make sure you include a CREATE TABLE... statement and INSERT INTO... statement into that table to give the volunteers here representative data. with your description of the problem, we can provide a tested, verifiable solution to your question! asking the question the right way gets you a tested answer the fastest way possible!
TheSQLGuru
TheSQLGuru
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 32639 Visits: 8677
You do work in the second query which doesn't happen in the first. I see no reason to expect the second query to not be some (microseconds?) slower than the other.

Best,
Kevin G. Boles
SQL Server Consultant
SQL MVP 2007-2012
TheSQLGuru on googles mail service
T.Ashish
T.Ashish
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1365 Visits: 607
Yes, I also feel second query should be slower. But both are working exactly same.
ChrisM@Work
ChrisM@Work
SSC-Forever
SSC-Forever (41K reputation)SSC-Forever (41K reputation)SSC-Forever (41K reputation)SSC-Forever (41K reputation)SSC-Forever (41K reputation)SSC-Forever (41K reputation)SSC-Forever (41K reputation)SSC-Forever (41K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 41957 Visits: 20008
T.Ashish (5/2/2013)
Yes, I also feel second query should be slower. But both are working exactly same.


How long do they take to run?
What method are you using to measure the execution time?

“Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
Exploring Recursive CTEs by Example Dwain Camps
GilaMonster
GilaMonster
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (227K reputation)SSC Guru (227K reputation)SSC Guru (227K reputation)SSC Guru (227K reputation)SSC Guru (227K reputation)SSC Guru (227K reputation)SSC Guru (227K reputation)SSC Guru (227K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 227465 Visits: 46339
They should be near-identical in time (and bear in mind that SQL's timers aren't accurate down to the ms level, that's stats time and perfmon). While the second does do more work and will use more CPU, it's likely to be a very small amount compared to the time to retrieve all the data (no filters on those queries)

Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability

We walk in the dark places no others will enter
We stand on the bridge and no one may pass


T.Ashish
T.Ashish
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1365 Visits: 607
Yes I agree. Both queries are executing in under 1 sec. so time can't be a measurement factor, may be in a very very big query we can see some difference.

I am finding same issue with DISTINCT and UNION where execution plan, IO and time is exactly identical for these three scenarios (Though query 2 gives different results):

(1)
select DISTINCT .....
UNION
select DISTINCT .....

(2)
select DISTINCT .....
UNION ALL
select DISTINCT .....

(3)
select .....
UNION
select .....
Lowell
Lowell
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)SSC Guru (72K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 72885 Visits: 40959
you really HAVE to compare differnet queries by their execution plans, and not by their perceived speed.

digging into those details are what gives you an understanding of why there are extra sorts or differences between two similar queries.



Lowell
--help us help you! If you post a question, make sure you include a CREATE TABLE... statement and INSERT INTO... statement into that table to give the volunteers here representative data. with your description of the problem, we can provide a tested, verifiable solution to your question! asking the question the right way gets you a tested answer the fastest way possible!
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search