I think Microsoft made its explanation of how the cutoff year functions more confusing by using the word "century". In my mind, and I suspect many others think the same way since this seems to be the most common usage, the word "century" denotes a 100-year period beginning on a year evenly divisible by 100, e.g. 1900 - 1999, 2000 - 2099. Thus, I might have decided that a two-digit year value of 65, being in the same "century" as the default cutoff year of 2049 (i.e., 2000-2099) would mean 2065.
Microsoft could have made the explanation clearer by specifying that "a two-digit year value is interpreted as being within the 100-year period ending with the cutoff year." That would make it crystal clear to me that a cutoff year of 2049 means that two-digit year values will be deemed to represent years 1950 - 2049 while a cutoff year of 2074 would mean that two-digit year values will be deemed to represent years 1975 - 2074, etc.
Are you sure a century is 1900-1999? I think a century is 1901-2000.
I see what you mean... but as the default year starts with 1900 in the SQL I guess what wolfkillj meant might be has to do with this... from 1900 (100 years, including 1900) will be 1999, so 2000 (including 2000) for next century will 2000-2099.
(sorry to burst in between)
The first and the hardest SQL statement I have wrote- "select * from customers" - and I was happy and felt smart.