Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


When Will You Upgrade to SQL Server 2012?


When Will You Upgrade to SQL Server 2012?

Author
Message
P Jones
P Jones
Say Hey Kid
Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)Say Hey Kid (682 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 682 Visits: 1503
We're in exactly the same situation as Bob Barrows, even down to the one app that's keeping a SQL2000 server going!

We have the added delay that any new software has to be tested and approved for use by the civil service before we can consider it and that can take a long time.
paul s-306273
paul s-306273
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1916 Visits: 1050
Of course, the first version of Oracle was 'Oracle V2' because they knoew people would be vary of 'V1'!
Barry G Freeman
Barry G Freeman
Valued Member
Valued Member (63 reputation)Valued Member (63 reputation)Valued Member (63 reputation)Valued Member (63 reputation)Valued Member (63 reputation)Valued Member (63 reputation)Valued Member (63 reputation)Valued Member (63 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 63 Visits: 283
I think for a lot of DBAs it's a comfort thing as well.

I know I have all my tools set up the way I like them, all my alerts fire properly when they're supposed to and my monitoring stuff gives me a good picture of what's happening, and what happened a while ago.

When problems with the apps happen, I know exactly where too look to hit the problem quickly.

I *still* get confused by the 2008 activity monitor change Smile when I have to use the 2008 SSMS and yes, it's going to be a huge investment in time and resources to upgrade to 2008 and then 2012 and still provide the day-to-day support of the existing infrastructure.

DBA (Dogsbody with Bad Attitude)
Boreades
Boreades
Grasshopper
Grasshopper (13 reputation)Grasshopper (13 reputation)Grasshopper (13 reputation)Grasshopper (13 reputation)Grasshopper (13 reputation)Grasshopper (13 reputation)Grasshopper (13 reputation)Grasshopper (13 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 13 Visits: 61
I'm surprised that one other type of response has not been mentioned yet, so let me be the first. w00t

We have no budget for any expenditure on non-critical software upgrades.Angry



Ian Elliott
Ian Elliott
SSC Veteran
SSC Veteran (231 reputation)SSC Veteran (231 reputation)SSC Veteran (231 reputation)SSC Veteran (231 reputation)SSC Veteran (231 reputation)SSC Veteran (231 reputation)SSC Veteran (231 reputation)SSC Veteran (231 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 231 Visits: 971
When I ask vendors why, they generally tell me that they don’t have the in-house resources to do the testing. In other words, they are cheap and don’t want to spend the money.


While I completely agree that this is true in many cases playing devil's advocate I know that there are some smaller houses who really don't have the time, money or resources to keep up with the latest new sql releases all the time.

Take someone who's just purchased sql server 08 last year and spent a year developing their new software product and need to get it to market and get sales for the next year or 2 to recoup their investment and pay the bills let alone have any extra for product upgrade, not to mention support costs of the existing product.

Situations like this come down to their prices and sales volumes and business feasibility and unfortunately there are some software vendors who struggle day to day to make more than a small margin and just manage to stay in the black.

So I'm not sure if "generally" is the right word but then again maybe I know more smaller vendors than larger ones so my perspective is more skewed in that regards. :-D
LightVader
LightVader
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (818 reputation)SSC Eights! (818 reputation)SSC Eights! (818 reputation)SSC Eights! (818 reputation)SSC Eights! (818 reputation)SSC Eights! (818 reputation)SSC Eights! (818 reputation)SSC Eights! (818 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 818 Visits: 2883
We have one database that we'll be migrating from 2005 to 2012 this year and another that we'll be migrating to 2008R2. Aside from those two, the rest of our databases are 2005. We'll be slowly migrating them, but I'm not sure if they'll go to 2008 or 2012.



The opinions expressed herein are strictly personal and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of my employer.
Markus
Markus
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1580 Visits: 3672
We are in the middle of our largest SQL Server in our stores upgrade right now. The DB is moving from a Win2003 Active/Passive cluster running on SQL2000. The new environment is all Win2008R2 and the db is an active/passive Win2008R2 cluster running SQL2008R2. It will be rolled out to all of our stores by July. Our other large SQL2000 Cluster has 25 dbs and two of them have been moved to another Win2008/SQL2008R2 Cluster with the others in the beginning stages of dev/test.

Other than that we have a handful of other smaller dbs in SQL2000 yet to convert. I expect 90% of those will be converted by June of next year.

We have about 250 SQL Server dbs here.

Based on the fact that our critical store apps dbs will be just fresh moved to SQL2008R2 this year I just don't see SQL2012 being a we need to upgrade to it in the next few years at all. I am sure we will have a few apps that we will upgrade in the coming few years that will require SQL2012. However, I just don't see us upgrading just because the new version is out.



Megistal
Megistal
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1608 Visits: 2555
Our client base (for our software solution) mainly uses XP so upgrading is not even "thinkable". We're a particular niche and we must conform to this situation.
chrisn-585491
chrisn-585491
SSC Eights!
SSC Eights! (944 reputation)SSC Eights! (944 reputation)SSC Eights! (944 reputation)SSC Eights! (944 reputation)SSC Eights! (944 reputation)SSC Eights! (944 reputation)SSC Eights! (944 reputation)SSC Eights! (944 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 944 Visits: 2309
If I want to use a recent version of SQL Server in production, I'll have to change companies. I have more up-to-date hardware and software than my employer does...w00t
jnmarlin
jnmarlin
Grasshopper
Grasshopper (21 reputation)Grasshopper (21 reputation)Grasshopper (21 reputation)Grasshopper (21 reputation)Grasshopper (21 reputation)Grasshopper (21 reputation)Grasshopper (21 reputation)Grasshopper (21 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 21 Visits: 90
This is a business, in the business to be profitable. There is no justifiable business reason for us to spend the incredible amount of time and money it would cost to upgrade when the current version works just fine. Microsoft makes so many changes to licensing models that determining which edition you need to go to to keep the features you have is mind boggling. Can't simply go from 2005 Standard to 2012 Standard and assume that they didn't bump some of your required features up to the much more expensive editions (which they have, of course). That bad habit alone will keep us in 2005 for a long, long time.



Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search