Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


Collation and SQL_VARIANT


Collation and SQL_VARIANT

Author
Message
Paul White
Paul White
SSChampion
SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 10338 Visits: 11350
Comments posted to this topic are about the item Collation and SQL_VARIANT



Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLblog.com
@SQL_Kiwi
Hugo Kornelis
Hugo Kornelis
SSCrazy Eights
SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 8323 Visits: 11569
Great question, Paul!!

Your production code will likely be more careful with these issues.

Can I interpret this as "Your production code will likely completely avoid the use of SQLVariant"?

(Okay, there may be circumstances where SQLVariant has its use, but I would strongly suggest only using it for data that is stored and retrieved but never operated upon in any other way).


Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP
Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
BrainDonor
BrainDonor
SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)SSCrazy (2.1K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2050 Visits: 11199
I'd never heard of SQL_VARIANT, thanks for the question.

Steve Hall
Linkedin
Blog Site
SG Cowley
SG Cowley
SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2309 Visits: 736
Also now validated on SQL Server 2000!

Learnt a couple of new things today. Thanks for the question. :-)
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell
Stewart "Arturius" Campbell
SSCertifiable
SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)SSCertifiable (5.8K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 5786 Visits: 7136
Great question, thanks.
Having worked on a database where tables had been defined with different collations to the default, and making use of SQL_VARIANT types, this was moderately simple.

I would echo Hugo's comment re the use of SQL_VARIANT: use only as a last resort.

____________________________________________
Space, the final frontier? not any more...
All limits henceforth are self-imposed.
“libera tute vulgaris ex”
Paul White
Paul White
SSChampion
SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)SSChampion (10K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 10338 Visits: 11350
Hugo Kornelis (11/1/2011)
Great question, Paul!!

Your production code will likely be more careful with these issues.

Can I interpret this as "Your production code will likely completely avoid the use of SQLVariant"?

(Okay, there may be circumstances where SQLVariant has its use, but I would strongly suggest only using it for data that is stored and retrieved but never operated upon in any other way).

Hah! Well I came across this collation behaviour with SQL_VARIANT when I was thinking one day about how EAV systems would work when confronted with string data with different comparison semantics that needed to be stored in the same (value) column. For sure, SQL_VARIANT is a niche market - but I have found it useful with UNPIVOT (or the equivalent APPLY syntax) from time to time. Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed the question.



Paul White
SQLPerformance.com
SQLblog.com
@SQL_Kiwi
Hugo Kornelis
Hugo Kornelis
SSCrazy Eights
SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 8323 Visits: 11569
SQL Kiwi (11/1/2011)
Hugo Kornelis (11/1/2011)
Great question, Paul!!

Your production code will likely be more careful with these issues.

Can I interpret this as "Your production code will likely completely avoid the use of SQLVariant"?

(Okay, there may be circumstances where SQLVariant has its use, but I would strongly suggest only using it for data that is stored and retrieved but never operated upon in any other way).

Hah! Well I came across this collation behaviour with SQL_VARIANT when I was thinking one day about how EAV systems would work when confronted with string data with different comparison semantics that needed to be stored in the same (value) column. For sure, SQL_VARIANT is a niche market - but I have found it useful with UNPIVOT (or the equivalent APPLY syntax) from time to time. Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed the question.

Yeah, EAV and UNPIVOT are about the only options I can think of where I would even consider SQLVariant. And, as I said, I would only store the value and toss it back to the user, not do anything fancy with it (like searching). Using EAV for anything else then simply storing and retrieving is worse than opening twenty cans of worms.;-)


Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP
Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
paul s-306273
paul s-306273
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)SSCommitted (1.9K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1923 Visits: 1060
Paul - nice question today.
call.copse
call.copse
SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)SSCrazy (2.8K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2848 Visits: 1860
Hugo Kornelis (11/1/2011)
SQL Kiwi (11/1/2011)
Hugo Kornelis (11/1/2011)
Great question, Paul!!

Your production code will likely be more careful with these issues.

Can I interpret this as "Your production code will likely completely avoid the use of SQLVariant"?

(Okay, there may be circumstances where SQLVariant has its use, but I would strongly suggest only using it for data that is stored and retrieved but never operated upon in any other way).

Hah! Well I came across this collation behaviour with SQL_VARIANT when I was thinking one day about how EAV systems would work when confronted with string data with different comparison semantics that needed to be stored in the same (value) column. For sure, SQL_VARIANT is a niche market - but I have found it useful with UNPIVOT (or the equivalent APPLY syntax) from time to time. Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed the question.

Yeah, EAV and UNPIVOT are about the only options I can think of where I would even consider SQLVariant. And, as I said, I would only store the value and toss it back to the user, not do anything fancy with it (like searching). Using EAV for anything else then simply storing and retrieving is worse than opening twenty cans of worms.;-)


I occassionally use an EAV type thing for very limited cases (storing central control variables that may vary by territory say) - is SQL_VARIANT a good move for storing these, where it may be text numbers or dates? I've tended to just use nvarchar(MAX) before and convert as needed.

For the UNPIVOT this would be for normalising some data perhaps for import purposes? I'm just struggling to come up with a use for this SQL_VARIANT chappy.
rfr.ferrari
rfr.ferrari
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.4K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1351 Visits: 13620
one more time, great question!

thanks, paul!


rfr.ferrari
DBA - SQL Server 2008
MCITP | MCTS

remember is live or suffer twice!
the period you fastest growing is the most difficult period of your life!

Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search