SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


The Special Cloud


The Special Cloud

Author
Message
Steve Jones
Steve Jones
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 62156 Visits: 19102
Comments posted to this topic are about the item The Special Cloud

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
IceDread
IceDread
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 505 Visits: 1145
I still view cloud as a matter simple renting servers but to get to rent them, you have to change your systems architecture completely. From what I've seen, azure has a long way still to go.

The power of the cloud does not at all seam to be processing power as one might think. You have to add roles for more cpu power etc. You have to do this while having no clue how much power you actually get, it's trial and error.

Another issue is the 30s limit on transactions. Ok granted, sql queries should never take this long, but since you do not know the strength of your service that you have rented, you do not know how much you need to tune your systems. What takes 2 seconds in one of the powerful servers you have today might take 20 seconds in the cloud. If you want to do a huge calculation, analyzing the market for instance, inserting millions of transactions and then doing the calculation, you have to batch this up in bits and pieces. Even the calculation itself! Because, if 30s is passed, you're screwed, your command is aborted.

So from my point of view, seeing how there are so many uncertain factors, only the "brave" would go for the cloud before we've seen some maturity of their services.
PatrickSimons
PatrickSimons
SSC Journeyman
SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)SSC Journeyman (97 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 97 Visits: 213
But: is the cloud really secure ??? Everybody's moving to the cloud, companies or private persons are putting their data, also sensitive data, outside on a server somewhere in the world. Never forget, everything can be cracked....


Patrick SIMONS, MCP
IceDread
IceDread
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 505 Visits: 1145
PatrickSimons (8/31/2011)
But: is the cloud really secure ??? Everybody's moving to the cloud, companies or private persons are putting their data, also sensitive data, outside on a server somewhere in the world. Never forget, everything can be cracked....


That is a very interesting question. The Swedish military certainly does not think so as it will not even send request for quotation to companies that makes use of cloud, it's one of the criteria.
Just like those working on dropbox can access everything you have in there, there is no reason a cloud company would not be able to do this.
Schodoodles
Schodoodles
Valued Member
Valued Member (55 reputation)Valued Member (55 reputation)Valued Member (55 reputation)Valued Member (55 reputation)Valued Member (55 reputation)Valued Member (55 reputation)Valued Member (55 reputation)Valued Member (55 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 55 Visits: 475
I think they need to get past leaving things on trains or sending CDs with millions of records of data via Royal Mail (and then it getting lost!) before they even jump to cloud services here in the UK.
It seems government offices here know more about losing data than keeping it safe and introducing cloud services would just make a much bigger mess.
blandry
blandry
SSC-Addicted
SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)SSC-Addicted (497 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 497 Visits: 723
Growing up, there was a phrase; "He has his head in the clouds" that suggests such a person is not paying attention, or aware of the consequences of what they are doing...

This past week a relative of mine told me that they have subscribed to one of these cloud-based backup services, and then asked me "do you think that was a wise idea?". I asked; "Did you carefully read the license agreement?" The answer of course was "No" - who reads all that legal-ease, and anyway this will now save them from buying any backup hardware.

About two days later I got a call from them in panic... "I just actually read the license agreement and it states that if they screw up or lose all my data, I have agreed not to hold them liable!!!"... Yeah, welcome to cloud-computing - too bad you clicked "I agree" before actually reading the agreement.

Its all very interesting what we are doing with the cloud and this morning's editorial brings more of that. But I still cannot help corresponding the cloud with what this country did with asbestos. We stuck it all over the place before realizing it kills people. Companies that made a fortune selling it, are now bankrupt and out of business. And people are still dying from the affects.

Sure, the cloud isnt going to kill anyone - but here we are again pushing something forward in Technology that is really still just an idea and we're making it up as we go along. That, and the fact that most average users dont read license agreements, bodes some future disaster where once again we look back and wonder - why didnt we think this through?

Simple: There's money to be made, and damn the end-users.

There's no such thing as dumb questions, only poorly thought-out answers...
Mattrick
Mattrick
SSChasing Mays
SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)SSChasing Mays (626 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 626 Visits: 767
I have security and ROI concerns over this. The security concerns stem from not having control over every piece of hardware. Granted, there are companies with this complete control that are still not secure, so perhaps this isn't a valid concern. The ROI concerns center around cost. Will this system cost more to operate than housing your own hardware and hiring your own IT dept? It's the US government, so chances are there will still be a huge bureaucracy involved with or without owning their own equipment.

I want it to work, but to me it feels like throwing money at a problem without solving any of it.
chrisfradenburg
chrisfradenburg
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)SSCommitted (2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1982 Visits: 2067
Mattrick (8/31/2011)
I want it to work, but to me it feels like throwing money at a problem without solving any of it.


For migrating existing applications to the cloud, I agree. That can be the case. But for new projects the initial input is much, much less than getting new hardware set up so I don't think that's the case there.

There are already several government projects running in the cloud and I'm hoping it's cheaper to run them there than with owned hardware but I haven't seen numbers either way.
IceDread
IceDread
Mr or Mrs. 500
Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)Mr or Mrs. 500 (505 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 505 Visits: 1145
cfradenburg (8/31/2011)
Mattrick (8/31/2011)
I want it to work, but to me it feels like throwing money at a problem without solving any of it.


For migrating existing applications to the cloud, I agree. That can be the case. But for new projects the initial input is much, much less than getting new hardware set up so I don't think that's the case there.

There are already several government projects running in the cloud and I'm hoping it's cheaper to run them there than with owned hardware but I haven't seen numbers either way.


So you do not want to handle the hardware yourself, why not just rent power from a company with a vm environment for you to grow in?
creeves 41422
creeves 41422
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)Forum Newbie (6 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 6 Visits: 12
that is an important point - anything can be cracked- including those systems not in the cloud.
So are we more vulnerable with scattered disparate systems connected to one Internet, or with a few cloud systems connected to one Internet?Unsure
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search