SQL Clone
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


The Titanic Cloud


The Titanic Cloud

Author
Message
Steve Jones
Steve Jones
SSC Guru
SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)SSC Guru (62K reputation)

Group: Administrators
Points: 62052 Visits: 19101
Comments posted to this topic are about the item The Titanic Cloud

Follow me on Twitter: @way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
jpksystems
jpksystems
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)Forum Newbie (1 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1 Visits: 6
As an old timer, I see this as something that we all should be doing as normal operating procedures. When everything was part of a large in-house environment, smart companies had back/recovery procedures in place. In addition, if you were really smart, you also had system disaster and recovery practices which included hot-swap sites. It all boiled down to how long could you stay in business if you lost part or all of your IT services. I see today's cloud environment as no different, or maybe even more important since companies in a total cloud environment have even less control over their environment than before.
OCTom
OCTom
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)Hall of Fame (3.1K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 3109 Visits: 4152
You need both, Steve. A good backup AND a good resume. :-)
jyates
jyates
Grasshopper
Grasshopper (12 reputation)Grasshopper (12 reputation)Grasshopper (12 reputation)Grasshopper (12 reputation)Grasshopper (12 reputation)Grasshopper (12 reputation)Grasshopper (12 reputation)Grasshopper (12 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 12 Visits: 186
With electronic connections between businesses increasing, businesses will need a way to determine if a potential connection is reasonably safe. Eventually, some sort of audit and rating system will be needed so that businesses can selectively make these sorts of determinations. Different aspects of a potential connection's secureness could be evaluated including primary risks (physical location, hardware, security software,...), secondary risks (third-party connections, outsourced activities, end-user devices,...), operational policies (access procedures, upgrade frequency and process, scheduled and unscheduled downtime,...), etc.

I personally think that the IT "industry" should attempt to do some self-policing before governments mandate it. Having experience in various business and technical functions, I've seen the broad impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and know that much of it has become window dressing with little real benefit (other than employment of auditors and consultants). A similar attempt in the IT world could be extremely costly and unproductive.
pjcrout
pjcrout
Valued Member
Valued Member (62 reputation)Valued Member (62 reputation)Valued Member (62 reputation)Valued Member (62 reputation)Valued Member (62 reputation)Valued Member (62 reputation)Valued Member (62 reputation)Valued Member (62 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 62 Visits: 78
Barring a catastrophe of global proportions, I think it is theoretically possible to achive a 100% (or at least 99.99%) Always On environment, given that the company/service has the necessary infrastructure redundacies, a strategic geographical distribution of hardware, and fail-over processes that are effective and automated.

Unfortunately, sometimes companies make the promise of "little to no down time" without actually spending the money to realistically back it up. I guess the "little" part of the promise is the loop hole as "a little down time" can be a very relative term...
SanDroid
SanDroid
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)SSCommitted (1.6K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1574 Visits: 1046
I do not know if PSN is considered true "cloud".
It affected 25 million SOE users for over 14 days, and who knows the count of users that where unable to access Netflix streaming.

Reading this article made me think of what a Titanic incident that has been for Sony.
Although I am sure they will be OK... ;-)
Craigmeister
Craigmeister
SSC-Enthusiastic
SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)SSC-Enthusiastic (114 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 114 Visits: 557
I would say the tactical question here is using cloud as primary and having backups vs. having primary onsite with cloud as hot secondary with backups vs. cloud as primary and hot secondary (2 different cloud "vendors") with backups. The business perspective is up-time vs. budget vs control. The mix will be different for different companies, managers, and even company and IT cultures.
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
SSC-Dedicated
SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)SSC-Dedicated (32K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 32094 Visits: 18551
I think one of the things to understand with services like what Amazon offers is to know all of your options within that service. If you have certain services that are primarily in the cloud, explore all of your failover options and be ready to act should something happen.



Jason AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server, MVP


SQL RNNR

Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw

Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search