Click here to monitor SSC
SQLServerCentral is supported by Redgate
 
Log in  ::  Register  ::  Not logged in
 
 
 


sp_tables


sp_tables

Author
Message
VM-723206
VM-723206
Say Hey Kid
Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)Say Hey Kid (662 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 662 Visits: 267
Comments posted to this topic are about the item sp_tables
Hardy21
Hardy21
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1204 Visits: 1399
Very straight forward question. Thanks.

Thanks
SQLRNNR
SQLRNNR
SSC-Insane
SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 21029 Visits: 18258
Thanks for the question.



Jason AKA CirqueDeSQLeil
I have given a name to my pain...
MCM SQL Server, MVP


SQL RNNR

Posting Performance Based Questions - Gail Shaw

Nakul Vachhrajani
Nakul Vachhrajani
SSCommitted
SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)SSCommitted (1.8K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1819 Visits: 2126
Straight-forward, simple, yet important question.
Thanks!

Thanks & Regards,
Nakul Vachhrajani.
http://nakulvachhrajani.com
Be courteous. Drive responsibly.

Follow me on
Twitter: @sqltwins
Google Plus: +Nakul
sharath.chalamgari
sharath.chalamgari
Ten Centuries
Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)Ten Centuries (1.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 1254 Visits: 798
simple one today Wink
Yousaf Khan
Yousaf Khan
SSC-Addicted
SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)SSC-Addicted (415 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 415 Visits: 113
Check the bellow link for this topic

http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/Stored-procedure-List-SQL-Server-database-objects-by-selected-types

Yousaf Khan
Hugo Kornelis
Hugo Kornelis
SSCrazy Eights
SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 8289 Visits: 11536
An interesting question.

I will not debate the quality of the question, but I will debate the quality of the documentation. Not the documentation that is linked to (this is a very old description, pointing to the SQL Server 2000 version of Books Online), but to the current version (found here), that is almost identical.

The description in BOL explicitly mentions the three types that were also the answer to this question: tbales, views, and system tables. But as of SQL Server 2005, system tables no longer exist - or rather, they do exist, but are completely hidden from view. They have been replaced by system views. These are returned by sp_tables - as views, not as system tables. So since SQL Server 2005, sp_tables no longer returns objects of the type SYSTEMTABLE.

The same description in BOL also says that sp_tables, and I quote, "Returns a list of objects that can be queried in the current environment. This means any object that can appear in a FROM clause, except synonym objects". If that were true, then some user-defined functions should be included as well, namely all table-valued functions. This is not the case.

My guess is that sp_tables has not been touched since SQL Server 2000. Neither the procedure, nor the documentation has been changed. And noone has noticed that, in spite of the lack of changes, external changes have made the documentation go out of sync.

Thanks for the interesting question, VM - I had never heard of this system stored procedure before. (And I'll probably forget about it within a few days;-)).


Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP
Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
sknox
sknox
SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2K reputation)SSCrazy (2K reputation)SSCrazy (2K reputation)SSCrazy (2K reputation)SSCrazy (2K reputation)SSCrazy (2K reputation)SSCrazy (2K reputation)SSCrazy (2K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2028 Visits: 2706
Hugo, I do hope that you've posted the same excellent analysis as a comment to the Microsoft documentation... :-P
adrian.facio
adrian.facio
Old Hand
Old Hand (342 reputation)Old Hand (342 reputation)Old Hand (342 reputation)Old Hand (342 reputation)Old Hand (342 reputation)Old Hand (342 reputation)Old Hand (342 reputation)Old Hand (342 reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 342 Visits: 386
Oh men, i was thinking about table valued functions and i answer incorrectly, they can be in a "from" clause. I was being very literal, surely msdn did not mean an absolute "everything that can be in a from clause".
Hugo Kornelis
Hugo Kornelis
SSCrazy Eights
SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)SSCrazy Eights (8.3K reputation)

Group: General Forum Members
Points: 8289 Visits: 11536
sknox (11/30/2010)
Hugo, I do hope that you've posted the same excellent analysis as a comment to the Microsoft documentation... :-P

Thanks! ;-)
And no, I did not. But I did submit it as feedback to the article, so that it will hopefully be fixed.


Hugo Kornelis, SQL Server MVP
Visit my SQL Server blog: http://sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis
Go


Permissions

You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.
You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Select a forum

































































































































































SQLServerCentral


Search