Nakul Vachhrajani, very good question.
Unfortunately
Nakul Vachhrajani
That's why said "the test above shows that..." - I didn't have the time to do the detailed reasoning when I encountered this issue (during a failed upgrade!). Your explanation is perfect, and I thank-you for the same.
to me you lost credability with this comment.
You did a big disservice to the readers of this forum when you posted such a great question with the wrong answer. Your comment after, at least to me was one of indifference.
Oleg provided a very good explanation, thanks Oleg. Hugo expanded upon it as well. But as Hugo stated earlier
Hugo;
The number of people reading the follow-up discussion is far less than the number of people who only answer the question and read the explanation. Since the goal of this site is (in my opinion) to educate, the submitter of the question has a huge responsibility to make sure the explanation is correct.
So true. I used to do the same - check in to see the daily subjects, answer the question then on to other things, not to login again until the next day or so. It was only recently (last few months) that I started actually reading the discussions and even feably attempting at providing a few QOD's as well as taking part in the dialogs which follow.
Again good question though.
Steve Jimmo
Sr DBA
“If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a Nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan