Joe Barbian (10/25/2007)
datetime2?why not just expand datetime to be more precise expecially if earlier comments are correct that it will take 8 bytes (i.e. no difference in storage space)?
It seems like a bad idea (to me anyway) to change the behaviour of an existing datatype. hardly useful for backwards compatability is it?
Jamie Thomson
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson