Yes, there just wasn't enough information in the article to make good use of it. Though I appreciate the obvious attention that went into writing the article and doing the screenshots, I'm left with little further knowledge. There's just to much basic information about this process left out. I'd frankly like to see a replay of the whole article with more detailed information.

>> "It would be good to see the package, as I am very confused by the article.

It does not include details of the command being executed, so its difficult to know what errors might be anticipated.

It does not include details of how error-handling was configured on the command component, so we cannot tell how we would expect any anticipated errors to be handled.

It does not include the error information reported on the Progress tab (or in the logs) which includes the OLEDB errors that would describe why the command failed - especially useful for errors that are either not explicitly handled by error options, or for which the error-handling options are just set to failure. "