• WhiteLotus - Thursday, January 10, 2019 4:53 PM

    Hi All ,
    I have tried 2 different approaches on changing the index structure
    Current Index structure :
    CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_ABC] ON [Table XX].[ColumnXX]
    (
        [ID] ASC
    )
    INCLUDE ( [ABCID],
    [XYZID],
    WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO

    First approach :
    I modified the current index by adding 2 columns as included column , it shows improvement in logical read (from 50.000 down to 750 ) on the table which contains those 2 columns
    But on the other hand it shows the decrease of logical read from other table which participate in the query ( from 18000 to 28000)

    Second approach :
    I deleted current index and created a new one with those 2 columns added as included column . it shows improvement in logical read (from 50.000 down to 750 )on the table which contains those 2 columns .
    And shows the small decrease of logical read from other table which participate in the query ( from 18000 to 21000)

    Question :
    Why  second approach is better than the first one ?

    Thanks and appreciate your feedback.

    Did you look at the actual execution plan? That might explain it.