• Jeff Moden - Thursday, October 12, 2017 11:41 PM

    Are you seeing roughly the same thing?

    The results I see follow a slightly different pattern. The CASE version is the slowest (and most variable), but the MATH OVERRUN method performs little differently from the remainder.


    ========== PRECAST Method ===============================================================
    Beginning execution loop
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 360 ms, elapsed time = 357 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 359 ms, elapsed time = 361 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 359 ms, elapsed time = 360 ms.
    Batch execution completed 3 times.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
    ========== DATENAME Method ===============================================================
    Beginning execution loop
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 360 ms, elapsed time = 356 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 359 ms, elapsed time = 358 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 359 ms, elapsed time = 357 ms.
    Batch execution completed 3 times.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
    ========== MATH OVERRUN Method ===============================================================
    Beginning execution loop
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 360 ms, elapsed time = 359 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 359 ms, elapsed time = 372 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 360 ms, elapsed time = 363 ms.
    Batch execution completed 3 times.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
    ========== CASE Method ===============================================================
    Beginning execution loop
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 1 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 468 ms, elapsed time = 482 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 438 ms, elapsed time = 442 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 453 ms, elapsed time = 448 ms.
    Batch execution completed 3 times.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
    ========== CONVERT CHAR(2) Method ===============================================================
    Beginning execution loop
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 343 ms, elapsed time = 349 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 360 ms, elapsed time = 363 ms.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    SQL Server Execution Times:
     CPU time = 343 ms, elapsed time = 352 ms.
    Batch execution completed 3 times.
    SQL Server parse and compile time:
     CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.

    If you haven't even tried to resolve your issue, please don't expect the hard-working volunteers here to waste their time providing links to answers which you could easily have found yourself.