• Jeff,

    Thank you for your thoughtful answer. They were annoyed because we had a general DB plan laid out, as presented in "review meeting 1", but because of several "surprises" encountered the DB team was forced to redesign several tables and relationships. These changes were unexpected and only completed about 2 days before "review meeting 2", where they were presented to the QA team. I appreciate your comment about QA needing time to make changes to their scripts but it seems a bit "optimistic", to me, to script for a design that has not been finalized. In this case if would have been better to have the QA members attend the hands-on DB working but I don't know if that is a good precedent.

    edm2