opc.three (4/1/2013)
mister.magoo (4/1/2013)
Lynn, Nope that pretty much sucks too! :hehe:Lynn's numbers seem off to me. I got ~10s for your method and ~50ms for Lynns. But Lynn's numbers make it look waaaay worse. I am wondering Lynn if your numbers are in nanoseconds?
Also, the difference could be the size of the string as it is concatenated. The table names in the database I used can get a bit long in the tooth.