Home Forums SQL Server 2005 Administering Avoid DEADLOCK for concurrent DELETE RE: Avoid DEADLOCK for concurrent DELETE

  • February 26, 2013 at 3:42 am

    #1591098

    VASUforSQL (2/25/2013)

    Hi ALL,

    I have a table called Products which has many columns.

    It is a temporary table used for reporting purpose. The data will be processed to this table concurrently by multiple user requests.(seperate Stored procedure to make DML operations to this table)

    ....

    And instance column have the newid() value. one user request will have one unique id; may have million rows. ...

    Instead of forcing all users to share a single huge dynamic "temporary" table with all of the hardship you are currently facing, why not give them one each, with none?

    “Write the query the simplest way. If through testing it becomes clear that the performance is inadequate, consider alternative query forms.” - Gail Shaw

    For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
    Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
    Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden