Alan.B (11/28/2012)
Evil Kraig F (11/28/2012)
This is NOT pretty, but it IS functional.I am trying to understand why went with a loop vs a set-based approach. I posted a more set based method earlier that gets the same results notably faster. I am not trying to be confrontational, I'm just trying to understand your approach or what I did wrong.
@Alan.b If i look at your method correctly it misses InvoiceID 3.
@Kraig your right about the issues with my method that you cant go both directions up the tree which i had forgotten about. (dont work with hierarchies much)
EDIT: i sat to long to hit the post button so struck what was said before the post.
For performance Issues see how we like them posted here: How to Post Performance Problems - Gail Shaw[/url]
Need to Split some strings? Jeff Moden's DelimitedSplit8K[/url]
Jeff Moden's Cross tab and Pivots Part 1[/url]
Jeff Moden's Cross tab and Pivots Part 2[/url]