• dwain.c (11/21/2012)


    Jeff Moden (11/21/2012)


    I don't believe that COLLATE will help a STUFF (but I haven't tested it). Logically speaking, it should only help when string comparisons are being made.

    I didn't think so either. 🙂 That wasn't what I meant by impact.

    It does seem to be helping the CHARINDEX in this case though, but sometimes I've found no effect.

    These result I got when I remove COLLATE:

    Using SUBSTRING and CHARINDEX

    1953

    Using PARSENAME

    1936

    Using PARSENAME with CROSS APPLY

    1923

    Using STUFF (Dwain) no check for a@b.com and empty

    1046

    Using STUFF (Dwain) with check for a@b.com and empty

    2016

    Using CLR

    360

    It's dramatic difference: 5 to 7 times slower than with binary collation.

    At least that what I can see on my server (default collation Latin1_General_CI_AS)

    _____________________________________________
    "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing"
    "O skol'ko nam otkrytiy chudnyh prevnosit microsofta duh!":-D
    (So many miracle inventions provided by MS to us...)

    How to post your question to get the best and quick help[/url]