As with most QotDs, I try and answer them, right or wrong, before researching the answer, so I can identify gaps in my knowledge rather than score points.

I'm afraid this question was just too obscure for me. It's a good question, sure, but why would I need to know this or reference it in any way? I mean, we have hundreds of databases, most of which actually use this collation, and this nugget has never, and will never come in useful.

It's a numbers question. It's a bit like asking, 'how many system tables exist in the MSDB after a vanilla installation of SQL Server 2005 with SP2 (on a full moon in the Northern Hemisphere while wearing Wellington boots and a silly hat, or any other irrelevance you care to name)?' - the answer can be found, but why would it be relevant to anyone in a DBA/BI/dev position?

I think my views are echoed in the results so far, one of the few QotDs where wrong answers (probably mostly guesses) outnumber right ones.

Sorry to be so harsh. I, too, am without my morning coffee.