Perry Whittle (9/25/2012)
No, it's not. This value
locked_page_allocations_kb
is a part of
physical_memory_in_use_kb
I didn't think locked pages were part of the working set which is why Task Manager lies to us but maybe locked_page_allocations_kb is not what I am thinking it represents. I don't have a 2008 machine with LPIM enabled at the moment to try it out so all my instance have 0 for locked_page_allocations_kb.
There are no special teachers of virtue, because virtue is taught by the whole community.
--Plato