I see very little of value in this article. The readers are ever so slightly better informed after reading it, but have acquired no useful information. In fact if your conclusions, or lack thereof, are to be believed no decisions should be altered based on the entire topic. As such wouldn't it have been better not to publish it and thus save us all the time spent reading it? This strikes me as the sort of irrelevant waffle published by academics that gives academia a bad name.

Before your next article please try to establish that the topic is worth reading about before writing about it.