• UMG Developer (4/12/2011)


    Lynn,

    I pointed out what I think SanDroid was trying to say in this post: http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost1090218.aspx

    I think this is one of those cases where the English language is imprecise and leaves too much up to the reader. The definition for affect is: "have an effect upon", so in the quote "data affecting the version store" the "data affecting" part can refer to the data changed in the actual database not the data inserted into the version store. (Since it is the data that is affecting the version store.) And that data is logged. Of course the data actually inserted into the version store affects the version store as well. So I technically I think both interpretations are correct.

    Disclaimer: I am not an English major, so I could be wrong. (It has been known to happen. :-))

    Thank you so much for that.

    You think this would be clear to anyone that compared what was given with the provided reference. Especialy when the article referenced a specific type of version store and gave it a special name.

    You are one of the few that get it.

    The refference material and the statement made about it are different and use different words.

    In my universe when you state your answer as A + B = a*b but your reference material and your work shows A + C = a*c then your answer is marked as incorrect.