SanDroid (4/12/2011)
Lynn Pettis (4/7/2011)
For the record, I missed this one too.I also found SanDroid and his arguments most interesting, if not totally off in left field somewhere. It is annoying when an individual refuses to support his position with demonstratable facts.
Strange, that was my position on the question.
What demonstrable fact would you like me to post that shows the lack of support for the correct answers listed in the reference material provided?
If you get asked crazy, about crazy, what do you respond with?
Maybe you did not understand why certain posts where even made.
Many were just responses to people that were not even trying to understand what the original objections about the QOTD was.
Someone misread something I posted, could be due to a typo made, and then I prove this in code. What they asked for had nothing to do with what I wanted to know about.
Bottom line, your stating your interpretation of the support information isn't enough. Support your position with code, hard data from the DMV's, output from t-logs (yes, there is a way to read the logs). Post the code and your results. Posting the code allows others to verify your results, to experiment with other alternatives.
To paraphrase an old saying, "Code talks, BS walks."